SURF THIS: Shoe story inspires at South by Southwest Conference

Jim Cota
April 2, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Jim Cota

A couple of weeks ago, I had the opportunity to spend some time with more than 100 other people involved in the Indianapolis technology community. As a group, we were joining thousands of people from around the world who converged on Austin, Texas, for the annual South by Southwest (SXSW) Interactive Conference.

SXSW is really three conferences in one: film, interactive and music. The entire event runs for 10 days, opening with the interactive portion and closing with music, while the film portion overlaps each.

For first-timers and veterans alike, understanding the scope of the event can be daunting. For example, the Interactive Conference schedule showed, on the first day, 11 different things happening that started with ‘A.’ There were 37 events to choose from at 2 p.m. on Thursday afternoon. There were more than 70 venues for events, and that list excludes the multitude of local bars where companies of all sorts and sizes hosted parties throughout the week.

Speakers ranged from industry heavyweights to up-and-comers to total unknowns. Miller Lite, AOL and Chevrolet shared the spotlight with startups that had nothing more than an idea. Just deciding where to go, what to do and what to see is challenging.

At the convention center, the Hilton, and the Radisson, I watched panels discuss topics such as “Should Agencies Think Like Software Companies?” and individuals present their ideas about “Designing for Silence: Using E-mail for Good.”

I listened to Internet pioneers Tim O’Reilly, Jon Gruber and Jeffrey Zeldman. I had a fascinating conversation with producer-actress Ramona Pringle, who wondered why her intelligent, beautiful and successful female friends couldn’t find love, while people playing online games seemed to be doing just fine.

In a word, the scope of information was dizzying.

But the story that stands out above the rest belongs to Blake Mycoskey of Toms Shoes (www.toms.com).

Blake took a leave of absence from his software company a few years ago to travel to Argentina to deliver shoes to kids who didn’t have any. He and a few friends delivered 500 pairs on that trip, and he was moved by the reaction he received. Later that night, he lay awake bothered by one question: “What happens when these kids grow out of the shoes we’ve just given them?”

To Blake, the answer was obvious: They needed to bring back more shoes, but he had no idea how to do that, at first.

The result was Toms Shoes, a company founded on the idea that, for every pair of shoes they sell, they give a pair away. With nothing more than an idea, a few pairs of shoes, and a passion for helping in any small way he could, Blake set his sights on returning to Argentina within a year to deliver 250 pairs of shoes.

He was back inside of eight months with 10,000 to give away.

There were certainly several examples of serendipitous good fortune that aided him along the way, but his message is simple: Doing good is good for business. He challenged everyone in attendance to incorporate giving into their work, to find ways to infuse this sense of charity into our daily business practices. He’s living proof that all of us can make a difference—and, if we do, we’ll all be better for it.

He certainly had an impact on me, and I’m sure mine isn’t the only company now trying to find the best way to build this into what we do.

I encourage you to do the same and, if nothing else, at least consider buying from Toms the next time you’re looking for a new pair of shoes.

Incidentally, Blake announced Toms, the “one for one shoe company,” is evolving into the “one for one company.” The company will announce its new product line in June. It will be interesting to see where it goes from here.

Having experienced this lollapalooza of information overload, I now realize the real draw of SXSW is the convergence of the people. I found myself having meaningful, valuable conversations on a daily (hourly?) basis that have altered how I think about the industry, my business and the future.

Interestingly, most of these conversations were with other people from Indianapolis. Seems I had to travel 1,000 miles to set aside the time to talk with people from down the block. By the time I made my way to the airport to head back home, I was exhausted, but energized. I was ready to get back to Indy and back to work, but found I was also beginning to think about next year, and what I was looking forward to most about SXSW. For more on the event—or, rather, the events—visit sxsw.com.•


Cota is creative director of Rare Bird Inc., a full-service advertising agency specializing in the use of new technologies. His column appears monthly. He can be reached at jim@rarebirdinc.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.