IBJNews

Single-minded super-PACs work to beat one candidate at a time

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Almost 30 years after he was an aide to Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana, venture capitalist Andrew Klingenstein received an appeal from the lawmaker’s former chief of staff: Let’s start a super-PAC.

Klingenstein agreed, and in January formed the Indiana Values Super-PAC with one goal, to help the six-term Republican combat attack ads by organizations like the small-government Club for Growth. Unlike Lugar’s re-election campaign, the independent super-PAC can accept unlimited donations. It has spent $137,000 against Lugar’s May 8 primary opponent, Indiana Treasurer Richard Mourdock.

The super-PAC and others are helping individual Senate candidates two years after the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United ruling removed limits on corporate and union independent election spending. The groups, formed to influence races in Virginia, North Dakota, Texas and other states, are arms-length partners that can air the toughest attack ads, said Bill Allison, editorial director of the Sunlight Foundation.

“We’re going to see this in a lot of the Senate races, where they take on a lot of the burden of negative advertising,” said Allison, whose group tracks campaign giving. “It’s a way for them to outsource the dirty work of a campaign.”

Independent super-PAC spending began late in the 2010 campaign. Candidate-specific groups emerged this year in the presidential race when supporters of President Barack Obama and Republican front-runner Mitt Romney created super-PACS. Senate races weren’t far behind, with Republicans trying to overturn the Democrats’ 53-47 control.

“That it’s happened next in Senate races is not particularly surprising because they’re pretty high-profile and there’s a tenuous hold on the chamber,” said Bob Biersack, a senior fellow at the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks campaign giving. “Every one of these races is going to be critical for who controls the Senate next year.”

In Texas, two super-PACs are supporting Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst in a May 29 Republican primary in a field that includes former state Solicitor General Ted Cruz. They are seeking to replace retiring Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison. Cruz is the favorite of FreedomWorks, which backs the Tea Party movement and has spent about $110,000 from its super-PAC to help him.

The Club for Growth’s super-PAC also favors Cruz and has spent almost $469,000 to defeat Dewhurst.

“The super-PACs are really a way to double down on the Dewhurst effort,” said Bill Miller, a Republican political consultant in Austin who has observed the pro-Dewhurst efforts. “He’s the favorite right now, but he does not want a run-off in late July with a conservative opponent.”

The Dewhurst-supporting super-PACs are raking in funds from long-time Republican donors. The Texas Conservatives Fund raised $490,100 by the end of March, including $100,000 from Bob Perry, a Houston donor who helped fund the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth ads that attacked Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry’s Vietnam War experiences in 2004.

The Conservative Renewal Super-PAC, founded in January to aid Dewhurst’s Senate race, has raised $600,000: $100,000 from highway construction company owner James Pitcock Jr. and $500,000 from Texas billionaire Harold Simmons. Both supported Texas Governor Rick Perry’s failed presidential bid.

In North Dakota, a political consultant with ties to Senate Republican leaders established the Freedom Pioneers Action Network on March 30. Its goal is to boost the candidacy of Republican Representative Rick Berg, who is expected to face former North Dakota Attorney General Heidi Heitkamp, a Democrat, in a contest to replace retiring Senator Kent Conrad.

“We’re in the process of getting it organized,” said Justin Brasell, the group’s treasurer. He also ran Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell’s 2008 re-election bid and the 2010 campaign of Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the third- ranking Republican leader in the chamber.

In Virginia, supporters of the two main candidates for the state’s Senate seat set up super-PACs within four days of each other. The Independence Virginia super-PAC, which supports Republican former Governor and Senator George Allen, was created March 9 and plans to raise as much as $3 million, said Paul Bennecke, director and treasurer of group.

“We have one mission and that is to make sure George Allen wins,” said Bennecke, who handled independent spending for the Republican Governors Association and worked on Republican Virginia Governor Robert McDonnell’s 2009 bid.

The New Virginia PAC formed March 13 to help former Governor Tim Kaine, a Democrat. Judith Zamore, a Washington, D.C.-based campaign consultant who is the group’s treasurer, declined to comment on its goals.

In Indiana, the pro-Lugar super-PACs are making some of the sharpest attacks. Hoosiers for Economic Growth and Jobs aired an ad March 30 in Indianapolis tying Mourdock to the voting record of former U.S. Rep. Chris Chocola. He is now president of the Club for Growth, which is spending funds to help Mourdock.

The pro-Lugar ad called Mourdock and Chocola ‘hypocrites” for suggesting Lugar isn’t conservative enough because Chocola once favored an expansion of Medicare, a minimum wage increase and “dozens” of appropriations earmarks.

An April 12 ad financed by the Indiana Values super-PAC said Mourdock skips most of the meetings of state boards he serves on. It said voters should “tell Richard Mourdock to stop running and do your job.” The super-PAC has raised almost $165,000, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

While the groups don’t coordinate with Lugar’s re-election committee, he Is among friends.

Hoosiers for Economic Growth and Jobs was founded by two political consultants for Meridian Pacific Inc., a Sacramento- based firm. Robert Vane, a spokesman for the group, said one of the consultants, John Peschong, knew Lugar when Peschong worked for President Ronald Reagan.

Top donors include Sam Fox, a former U.S. ambassador to Belgium and now chairman of St. Louis-based Harbour Group. He gave $25,000 to a group that has spent about $215,000 in the race, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Indiana Values Super-PAC is led by former Lugar chief of staff Chip Andreae. Klingenstein and his father, philanthropist John Klingenstein, each gave $25,000. Mark Dalton, president and chief executive of Tudor Investment Corp. in Greenwich, Conn., gave $50,000. Dalton and Lugar both serve on the board of trustees of Lugar’s alma mater, Denison University in Granville, Ohio.

Klingenstein said both super-PACs, which are loosely coordinating, plan a final burst of ads the next few weeks.

“It’s going to be an absolute sprint to the finish,” said Klingenstein, the group’s treasurer. “We’re going to be on the air as much as we can.”

At least one super-PAC is aimed at trying to unseat a candidate rather than to help one get elected.

Two labor unions in Boston, the Massachusetts Teachers Association and the Service Employees International Union, are financing a super-PAC to defeat freshman Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown, a Republican. It has raised $695,000 to influence Brown’s race against Democrat Elizabeth Warren.

Rethink Super-PAC spokesman Stephen Crawford said it isn’t buying TV ads for now. Brown and Warren agreed that if any super-PAC buys TV ads, the candidate benefiting must donate half the value of the ads to a charity of the other’s choosing. Crawford said his group is considering get-out-the-vote and other ways to influence the race.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • I'm a conservative BUT....
    But what exactly is "an unappologetic conservative?" Is it a conservative who offers no appologies to putting the screws to the low and middle incomes, as long as the rich get richer? Or not being sorry over bringing in worse jobs at much reduced wages, all so the greedy 1% can get wealthier? I think that I know my answers.....

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT