IBJNews

Six Hoosier firms among country’s 500 largest

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Six Indiana companies, including three based in Indianapolis, are among the nation’s 500 largest corporations in terms of revenue, according to Fortune magazine’s latest annual ranking, released Monday morning.

Indianapolis-based health insurer WellPoint Inc. ranked highest among Hoosier firms, at 45th, with $60.7 billion in annual revenue. That’s down slightly, from 42nd, in 2011.

Another local company, Eli Lilly and Co., followed at 119th, with $24.3 billion in annual revenue. The pharmaceutical firm’s placing also fell a bit from the previous year, when it ranked 115th.

Columbus, Ind.-based Cummins Inc. rose from 186th in 2011 to 150th this year, as the diesel-engine manufacturer’s annual revenue climbed 36 percent, to $18 billion.

Steel Dynamics Inc. in Fort Wayne came in at 323rd, up 45 spots from the previous year, as annual revenue increased from $6.3 billion to $8 billion.

Merrillville-based utility NiSource Inc. fell from 362nd to 409th, with $6 billion in annual revenue.

And BrightPoint Inc. in Indianapolis made its first appearance on the list since 2009, placing 463rd, with $5.2 billion in annual revenue.

Overall, Exxon Mobil displaced Wal-Mart as the country’s largest corporation, with $452.9 billion in annual revenue.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT