IBJNews

State revamps its revenue forecasting after big miss

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Growing ranks of dropout workers have nagged the economy throughout its recovery, and now Indiana’s budget forecasters feel they can’t ignore the trend.

They recently revised their outlook on state revenue downward, partly because so many Hoosiers stopped looking for jobs.

Revenue fell far short of the November target, prompting Gov. Mike Pence to make midstream budget cuts. So the forecast team decided to replace the unemployment rate—where Indiana made big strides last year—with the labor-force participation rate—where things aren’t so rosy—in the model for predicting sales-tax revenue.

Now, sales tax, the state’s largest source of income, is expected to generate $6.9 billion in the year that ends June 30, down 2.5 percent from the April prediction. The forecast for total revenue was similarly revised, to $14.4 billion. The forecast for the fiscal year 2015 also was revised downward, by 2.7 percent, to $14.9 billion.

Ketzenberger Ketzenberger

“This is the first time I’ve seen the economic forecast and the revenue forecast seem a little bit at odds,” said John Ketzenberger, president of the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute.

The Indiana unemployment rate dropped by more than one percentage point over the year to 7.3 percent in November, the most recently reported figure. Also in November, Indiana added 25,000 jobs and recorded the fastest pace of job growth in the nation.

Despite the apparent growth, revenue came up short of forecast in November by $141 million, or 3 percent. Pence cut state agency and university budgets and said he would sell a state airplane.

tax-revenue-table.gifThat certainly was not the first time revenue has been off-target. However, “We get particularly nervous when the error is above 2 percent or so,” said John Mikesell, an Indiana University economist who is the non-partisan adviser on a six-person technical team that includes Republican and Democrat appointees. The technical team produces the forecasts for the State Budget Committee, which is made up of Republican and Democrat lawmakers.

The technical team believes discouraged workers are one factor. The unemployment rate only captures people who are seeking work. So when that pool shrinks, the rate improves, even if jobs aren’t widely available.

“We think the unemployment rate is not as effective at capturing the impact on household spending,” Mikesell said.

Indiana’s labor-force participation rate was 60.2 percent in 2013, four and a half points lower than in 1991. The long-term trend is rooted in an aging work force, but since the Great Recession it includes people who aren’t really old enough to retire, Ball State economist Mike Hicks said.

“It’s very hard when you’ve been out to easily re-enter the labor force. That’s what you’re seeing,” Hicks said. Even though manufacturing jobs are rebounding, a lot of Hoosiers with outdated skills are being left behind, he said.

The upshot for state coffers, Mikesell said, is that work force dropouts also ratchet down their household spending, generating less sales-tax revenue. He declined to predict whether many of the so-called discouraged workers will look for jobs again, but he said participation stats will be part of the forecast model unless that model stops working.

kenley-luke-mug Kenley

The budget forecasters tweaked their other tax-revenue models, as they often do, in December, and that appears to have improved their accuracy. But the revised revenue figures left Sen. Luke Kenley, chairman of the State Budget Committee, feeling less confident about cutting taxes and spending more on programs.

“I’m very skittish about this whole exercise,” Kenley said.

Nevertheless, he’s backing a tax-cut bill, Senate Bill 1, which would serve as a proxy for eliminating the business personal property tax, Gov. Mike Pence’s top priority for the short legislative session.

The Senate proposal hopes to avoid a $1 billion hit to local-government coffers by eliminating the tax, which is essentially an equipment tax only on those businesses claiming $25,000 or less a year. At the same time, the state would drop its corporate income-tax rate even lower.

The rate is scheduled to go from 8 percent to 6.5 percent by July 1, 2015, and the Senate proposal would push it down to 4.9 percent by 2019.

Kenley said lowering the corporate tax rate will help companies like U.S. Steel and Eli Lilly and Co., which also have some of the biggest equipment-tax bills.

The full impact of the corporate income-tax cut in 2019 would be $135 million a year, and at this point, the Senate does not have a way to offset that revenue. Kenley hopes the tax cut will pay for itself, as it attracts more big businesses to the state.

Ketzenberger said the state could probably absorb another corporate income-tax cut over several years, but it would come on top of other cuts already in motion. The Legislature last year eliminated the estate tax and began ratcheting down the state’s personal income tax rate, which is 3.4 percent, by 5 percent.

“I’ve said for a while now, it’s probably a good idea to step back and see what the effect of all these changes has been,” Ketzenberger said.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Age and Participation Rates: An Example
    Janet - All good points and good questions. Case in point: I retired 2 years from a management position--I ran an office of about 35 professional staff and lead several audit teams. I have a good resume. I applied for over 50 private and non-profit jobs in the Indy area. Silence was the response I got from the faceless people behind the internet. I have given up on finding a job although many positions that I could fill are advertised in the media, both print and electronic. I suspect age discrimination is at work here but I have not way to determine that. I suspect your friend is experiencing the same discriminatory behavior from prospective employers. I guess we could fall under the statistic dealing with participation rate but I think we are actually invisible.
  • Failed predictions
    This article states that Indiana led the nation in pace by adding 25,000 jobs in November. What type of jobs were those? Were they low paying jobs? Other states could have easily added half those jobs, but they may pay twice as much and that would mean more tax revenue for those states. It seems that the statistics are lacking critical depth about the types of jobs being created and the level of pay. These are very important factors. In addition, there is so much fodder about the working age people who have dropped out of the work force or have stopped looking. One HUGE question here: how do you know if someone is looking for work or if they are not. I have a friend in her mid-fifties that has been looking for work for over 3 years since she lost her last job. Her unemployment insurance ended almost 2 years ago. I would guess that she doesn't even exist in these statistics. How could she? Who is keeping track of what she does? How do you know if she is looking for work or if she is not? This is what seems so crazy about all of these statistics! There are a lot more people out here looking for work that you have no way of counting. Wake up!!! Our state is in bad shape and it seems to become more hopeless for people like my friend every day.
  • More Unnecessary Uncertainty
    We normally expect the state government to help bring stability to its government entities and the services they provide. We now have a Governor that brings constant uncertainty to the fiscal picture--unexpected revenue shortfalls and imprecise forecasts at a time when new tax cuts are in motion and a $1 billion proposed tax is in the works without any notion of how to offset the tax cuts. All for the sake of attracting new jobs to the state, which are also uncertain. Is this any way to run a state government?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....

ADVERTISEMENT