KOVACS: Time is now for health care reform

August 10, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

One of the biggest challenges facing our nation is health care reform. Despite development of the most innovative and significant advances in medical treatment, our ability as health care professionals to provide high-quality, cost-effective and continual patient care too often falls by the wayside as a result of misalignments in our health care system.

Medical groups in Indiana and around the country have an opportunity in this time of change to pre-emptively address the need for health care reform with a stronger emphasis on patient care and disease prevention.

Heart disease is the leading killer in both Indiana and the nation, and 43 percent of all Medicare dollars are spent on heart disease. In Indiana, heart disease and stroke accounted for 32 percent of all deaths in 2005, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. As the Indiana population expands and grows older, heart disease, stroke and the economic costs associated with treatment and rehabilitation will only increase.

States like Indiana that have large rural areas are especially at risk. Nearly 50 million people in rural America have difficulty gaining access to health care, according to a report released earlier this month by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. These individuals report more health problems, are more likely to be uninsured, and are likely to have greater difficulty finding a primary health care provider than those in urban areas. In addition, obesity, diabetes, heart disease and high blood pressure are more common among rural residents, all of which are chronic conditions driving up the cost of care.

I recently spent time in Washington, D.C., talking to our elected officials about the importance of health care reform and educating them about the role health care professionals can and should play in reform efforts. The American College of Cardiology has developed a series of action plans that, with the support of Congress, Medicare and other stakeholders, can make major contributions in both cardiovascular care and overall system reform.

Included are proposals to reduce cardiovascular-related hospital readmission rates, limit inappropriate imaging, reduce geographic variations in care, and restructure the physician reimbursement process so it rewards for quality—rather than quantity—of care.

Improving partnerships with patients and getting them involved in care decisions is also critical. Patients who are involved and invested in their care and work with their doctors as equal partners just do better. For example, patients who are enrolled in outpatient heart-failure-management programs that require them to take an active role in managing their disease have fewer hospital admissions, better quality of life, and lower death rates than patients who do not participate in their own care, according to a study reported in The New England Journal of Medicine. Health care reform plans should encourage such patient involvement.

The implementation and use of health information technology is also key to supporting quality care. The Obama administration and Congress recognized that this year when they provided $20 billion in funding for health IT. Health IT systems are the foundation on which to build a better health care delivery system. They have the potential to increase coordination across sources and sites of care, decrease duplication and improve efficiency. To be successful, however, they must be interoperable and provide decision-support tools, like guideline-recommended therapies, at the point of care. Without these elements, health IT becomes just another promise.

The time is now to move on health care reform. We must impress upon our lawmakers the importance of acting to put in place incentives and structures that allow health care providers and patients to work together toward more effective and efficient health care for all Americans.•


Kovacs is clinical director of the Krannert Institute of Cardiology and president-elect of the American College of Cardiology.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!