IBJNews

UPDATE: Indiana vanity plate fight could go to Legislature

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A fuss over a police officer's vanity plate has blown up into a constitutional debate that could lead to the Indiana General Assembly deciding whether to rewrite the law or stop selling personalized license plates altogether.

The Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles filed a notice of appeal Monday, asking the state Supreme Court to overrule a local judge who said the agency violated the officer's freedom of speech when it revoked his license plate that read "0INK."

Drivers haven't been able to buy vanity plates in Indiana since July 2013, when Greenfield Police Officer Rodney Vawter sued the BMV, with the help of the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana. The agency's website offers guidance on how to apply for personalized license plates but warns that it is not currently accepting applications.

BMV Commissioner Donald M. Snemis told The Associated Press in an exclusive interview that if the Indiana Supreme Court agrees to take up the issue, it may direct lawmakers to rewrite the law. This could lead to the removal of the right to have vanity plates for all Indiana drivers.

"At that point, the Legislature is going to have to have a discussion about whether we want to have a personalized license plate system," Snemis said.

BMV spokesman Josh Gillespie said Monday that the appeal would be filed by the end of the day.

Vawter, who had his license plate for three years, won his lawsuit in May in a Marion County court. He did not return phone messages or emails seeking comment.

In his June ruling, Judge James Osborn also took on the BMV, saying it has no formal regulations in place for evaluating the content of vanity plates and ordering it to create standards that meet constitutional requirements within six months.

Osborn ruled that the BMV violated some vanity plate applicants' free speech rights by turning down some requests while allowing others. The BMV cited a state statute that allowed it to refuse to issue a plate when officials deem it carries "a connotation offensive to good taste and decency" or that "would be misleading."

The judge found the agency's use of its own standards was inconsistent and biased. For example, the agency revoked an "UNHOLY" vanity plate but allowed vanity plates such as "B HOLY" and "HOLYONE." The BMV also rejected the vanity plate "HATER" but accepted "HATE" and "HATERS." And while revoking Vawter's "0INK" plate, it allowed plates reading "OINKS" or "OINKER."

Osborn ordered the agency to restore the program under strict guidelines until it could write new rules that don't violate freedom of speech.

The BMV argues that the ruling rewrote the rules and would force it to allow offensive plates that might insult ethnic groups. But the ACLU contends in legal documents that the BMV is still allowed to deny plates that are defamatory, vulgar or could incite violence.

Getting rid of personalized license plates might not mean much in monetary terms, as vanity plate sales accounted for only 2.8 percent of the $103 million sent to license branches across the state in 2013, according to BMV figures obtained by the AP.

But, politically, it could have an impact.

"The Legislature is free — of course — to drop the personalized license plate program. However, I believe every state has one and it is extremely popular," ACLU Legal Director Ken Falk said in an email.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • vanity plate revenue
    Hmmmm. Pretty soon, after a year or 10, $2,884,000 annually gets to be "real" money. reporter making too much money if...oh, okay, i'll stop now.
  • vanity place revenue
    It always tickles me when a reporter decides he has the right to editorialize with the word "only", such as the one did in the following: "vanity plates only account for 2.8 percent of the $103 MIILLION sent to the state...." Since when does $2,884,000 in revenue or profit become "only." ridiculous choice of words.
    • Stupid
      This whole debate is stupid. I have an easy rule for not upsetting anyone: no vanity plates. Freedom of speech? You can write anything you want on the back of your car. License plates should be strictly for identifying a vehicle, not for any other kind of messages (including "In God We Trust"). We don't allow people to choose their own social security number and you don't see people filing lawsuits because they wanted to be "666-66-6666"
    • Stop telling us what to do!
      Thomas Jefferson said it best " When people fear the govenment that is tyranny; When goverment fears the people- that is liberty" Local government and our BMV should quit moralizing and obstructing first amendment rights. I do not need you to think for me. I can do this all by myself.
    • BMV Moralizing Violates First Amendament
      Chip - You make good points. This all started to go downhill when a few Indiana Senators decided to take on the Indiana Youth Organization because they did not like having an organization representing the LGTB community getting its own plate. The BMV should quit moralizing and obstructing first amendment rights.
    • "Pay UP" License Plate
      I am a collection attorney. I would be upset if I am prohibited from havng "Pay Up" on my license plate.
    • Why?
      Why would one want to pay for a vanity plate in the first place? All that means is that the BMV gets to collect more money from you. I guess people have different philosophies and mine is to pay the BMV the minimum amount I must in order to have the privilege to drive my car on Indiana's fine roads.
      • Out of control BMV
        Appears as if we may have an out of control BMV...from overcharging Hoosiers to "You can have a personalized plate as long as WE think it's ok." Why oh why is this state so backwards?

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      ADVERTISEMENT