IBJNews

Utility watchdog: Ending efficiency program 'short-sighted'

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The leader of a consumer watchdog group said Tuesday that Indiana lawmakers put the state at a disadvantage when they passed a bill killing an energy-efficiency program that could have helped the state meet the new federal carbon-emission goal by 2030.

Lawmakers approved a bill in March that will halt the state's fledging Energizing Indiana program on Dec. 31, ending its energy-saving efforts, such as low-income home weatherizations.

Citizens Action Coalition executive director Kerwin Olson said lawmakers were "short-sighted" in light of Monday's announcement by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which said coal-dependent Indiana has three years to come up with a plan to cut carbon dioxide emissions by 20 percent over the next 16 years as part of a sweeping national push to combat global warming. Energy-efficiency programs are among the tools states can use to reach their carbon-reduction goal.

"We kind of shot ourselves in the foot here in Indiana by eliminating these programs. It was a short-sighted decision and more so now that we've seen these carbon rules that would allow efficiency programs to be used as a tool to meet these goals," Olson said.

Although Gov. Mike Pence said in March he was disappointed lawmakers killed the program without offering a replacement, he nonetheless allowed the law to take effect. The Republican governor said he would propose an alternative program for lawmakers to consider next year.

Indiana's five largest electric utilities have all filed proposals outlining energy-efficiency programs they hope to implement after the Energizing Indiana program ends. The plans by Duke Energy, Vectren, Indiana Michigan Power, Northern Indiana Public Service Co. and Indianapolis Power & Light need the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission's approval.

IURC spokeswoman Danielle McGrath said the commission will consider those plans as it drafts recommendations that Pence had requested for a successor to the Energizing Indiana program. The panel is also working to prepare an assessment for lawmakers by Aug. 15 on Indiana's efficiency programs — findings that could factor in legislation next session.

The IURC is also accepting public input until Monday on Indiana's future energy-efficiency programs.

"So there are kind of three different tracks going on, but all under that same umbrella," McGrath said.

Energizing Indiana, which began in 2012, has saved enough energy to power nearly 93,000 Indiana homes, according to its website. Its goal was achieving a 2-percent annual savings in total electric sales by 2019.

Supporters, including businesses and environmental groups, said it has employed hundreds of workers and saved money for consumers who receive free in-home energy audits. But Indiana's manufacturing and utility interests argued the program, financed through a fee on monthly electricity bills, had proven too costly and industrial users saw few benefits.

Sen. Jim Merritt, R-Indianapolis, who wrote the bill that eventually was rewritten into legislation that eliminated the program, said Energizing Indiana had cost ratepayers $500 million since 2009 and would have cost as much as $1.9 billion more by 2019.

Duke Energy is Indiana's largest electric utility, with about 800,000 customers in 69 of Indiana's 92 counties. Spokesman Lew Middleton said Duke Energy's energy-efficiency proposal would restore programs it offered to its customers from 1991 until the Energizing Indiana program began.

"Instead of mandated targets what we're doing is simply saying to our customers, 'We've got this portfolio of energy-efficiency programs we can offer and we encourage you to take advantage of those — you can save energy and save money," he said.

Olson, of the Citizens Action Coalition, said the utilities' plans are "not bad" but all but one of them would cover only a single year. He said the consumer watchdog group would prefer utilities offer 3-year programs.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • You guys don't read so well
    I wonder if all the Commenters on this story are Citizens Action Coalition members, because what this (conveniently?) doesn't tell you is that under Energize Indiana, CAC could call every Joe Ratepayer out there, phone-bank style, ask them if they wanted a "free" Energy Audit, and then CAC got paid $25 for doing it. So of course Kerwin & Co. didn't want to see it go away. What the story DOES tell you, but apparently everyone ignores, is: 1.) "Energizing Indiana had cost ratepayers $500 million since 2009 and would have cost as much as $1.9 billion more by 2019." and 2.) The utility companies were required to submit new energy efficiency plans by May 31 to replace Energize Indiana -- and they did. So new efficiency plans are coming. But, I guess even us masses have to inject drama and partisan b.s. into everyday story, right?
  • Suckers
    Big business gets to self regulate. Just how stupid are the people of this state to not see through this? I guess maybe the upcoming election results will answer that question. Or perhaps the past ones already have.
  • Ash Ponds
    By the way, Indiana has more coal ash ponds (40) than any other state. Arsenic is one toxic component and many of these ponds are unlined. Way to go Indiana keep, shoveling that coal.
  • Picture Re-inventing the Wheel
    Let's see... the Legislature kills off the Energy Indiana program cause it might save citizens money on their energy costs, but it will cost big business money and profits that they don't want to give up. The businesses now want to do their OWN programs, not a State-wide effort. I think they just wanted to delete the part of the program that says they can't pollute as much. After I read this article, I got a picture of Governor Pence's chief strategists working on his bid for President that he's been running for since he was elected Governor. They're all sitting around a table and there's a picture of a wheel on the blackboard. Their leader says, "So how do we break this wheel, so we can re-invent it the same as we did with Medicaid and say that WE developed a new, better wheel for Hoosiers?" and another says, "It's simple, we'll get the business guys to help kill off the old program and then design a new program with their help." That way, we can be sure they will give us money for the next campaign. It's not a pretty picture, folks, but when Hoosiers only vote for one party ALL THE TIME, this is the kind of foolishness that the politicians will feed us. Maybe, next election, citizens should look for some real leaders to govern-- I know they are out there; they just might not all be Republicans.
  • Self Interest Run Amok
    It needs to be noted that Senator Jim Merritt (R-Indianapolis) works for a railroad company that gets much, if not most, of its revenue by hauling coal to coal-burning power plants. It was in his company's and clients' best interests to cripple energy efficiency programs. More coal burned is more money in their pockets, regardless of the negative impacts on Indiana.
  • Stupid Party
    Another example why the Republican party is called the "Stupid Party".

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
ADVERTISEMENT