IBJNews

Verizon Wireless Center getting new name

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Outdoor amphitheater Verizon Wireless Center in Noblesville will be renamed Klipsch Music Center under a new sponsorship agreement between speaker manufacturer Klipsch Group Inc. and venue owner Live Nation Entertainment.

Terms of the 5-year agreement, effective Thursday, were not disclosed. Company officials are scheduled to make an official announcement about the sponsorship Thursday morning at the amphitheater.

The 24,000-capacity concert venue, which opened in 1989 as Deer Creek Music Center, became Verizon Wireless Center in 2001 under a sponsorship agreement that expired this year.

“Today marks one of the most significant milestones in Klipsch history,” said Klipsch CEO Paul Jacobs in a prepared statement. “For 65 years, Klipsch has delivered on founder Paul W. Klipsch’s groundbreaking acoustic principle of recreating the live music experience. Live shows and their memorable, emotional impact have defined us as a company..."

Klipsch, based in Indianapolis since 1989, was acquired earlier this year by New York-based Audiovox Corp. for $166 million. It operates in Indianapolis as a stand-alone operation with 130 local employees. Earlier this year, Klipsch signed naming-rights agreements with Live Nation for the 7,500-seat Klipsch Amphitheater in Miami and the 1,100-capacity Irving Plaza Powered by Klipsch in New York City.

“The Klipsch brand is a great fit for this sponsorship, enabling them to reach, engage and connect with live music fans and their customers at our venues,” Maureen Ford, venue network president at Live Nation, said in a prepared statement.

The Noblesville venue has seating for about 6,000 in its pavilion area and room for about 18,000 in the lawn area. An average of more than 500,000 people attend events each year at the 228-acre facility, according to Live Nation.

The center is one of eight amphitheaters that Beverly Hills, Calif.-based Live Nation owns outright. Others are leased or operated under a booking contract.

The ticketing and promotions giant inherited the venue through a series of mergers. Local concert promoters Dave Lucas and Steve Sybesma opened Deer Creek in 1989 and later sold their company, Sunshine Promotions, to SFX Entertainment. Clear Channel Communications acquired SFX and in 2005 spun off Live Nation.

The venue was developed for about $12 million. Indiana gospel singer Sandi Patti was the headliner when it opened on May 20, 1989.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • original name
    It may have been Indiana Fieldhouse at conception, but Conseco signed on before it was built, didn't they? So the building was never really built as Indiana Fieldhouse.
  • Conseco Fieldhouse orginal name
    A lot of people forget that Conseco Fieldhouse was originally called Indiana Fieldhouse before the Conseco deal. It wasn't Indianapolis Fieldhouse as pointed out above but it definitely was Indiana Fieldhouse before they made the Conseco deal. If I remember correctly, the Conseco deals run out relatively soon (next 8 or 9 years roughly) so it will almost certainly be something other than Conseco Fieldhouse before too long. Conseco doesn't have the money to retain the naming rights once the current deal runs out.
  • Fieldhouse
    It has never been Indianapolis Fieldhouse
  • Deercreek
    IT will always be deercreek to me. Especially if these places continue to play musical names. IRP, Indianapolis Fieldhouse, Hoosier dome and well i guess its always been lucas oil stadium.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT