IBJNews

Verizon Wireless Center getting new name

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Outdoor amphitheater Verizon Wireless Center in Noblesville will be renamed Klipsch Music Center under a new sponsorship agreement between speaker manufacturer Klipsch Group Inc. and venue owner Live Nation Entertainment.

Terms of the 5-year agreement, effective Thursday, were not disclosed. Company officials are scheduled to make an official announcement about the sponsorship Thursday morning at the amphitheater.

The 24,000-capacity concert venue, which opened in 1989 as Deer Creek Music Center, became Verizon Wireless Center in 2001 under a sponsorship agreement that expired this year.

“Today marks one of the most significant milestones in Klipsch history,” said Klipsch CEO Paul Jacobs in a prepared statement. “For 65 years, Klipsch has delivered on founder Paul W. Klipsch’s groundbreaking acoustic principle of recreating the live music experience. Live shows and their memorable, emotional impact have defined us as a company..."

Klipsch, based in Indianapolis since 1989, was acquired earlier this year by New York-based Audiovox Corp. for $166 million. It operates in Indianapolis as a stand-alone operation with 130 local employees. Earlier this year, Klipsch signed naming-rights agreements with Live Nation for the 7,500-seat Klipsch Amphitheater in Miami and the 1,100-capacity Irving Plaza Powered by Klipsch in New York City.

“The Klipsch brand is a great fit for this sponsorship, enabling them to reach, engage and connect with live music fans and their customers at our venues,” Maureen Ford, venue network president at Live Nation, said in a prepared statement.

The Noblesville venue has seating for about 6,000 in its pavilion area and room for about 18,000 in the lawn area. An average of more than 500,000 people attend events each year at the 228-acre facility, according to Live Nation.

The center is one of eight amphitheaters that Beverly Hills, Calif.-based Live Nation owns outright. Others are leased or operated under a booking contract.

The ticketing and promotions giant inherited the venue through a series of mergers. Local concert promoters Dave Lucas and Steve Sybesma opened Deer Creek in 1989 and later sold their company, Sunshine Promotions, to SFX Entertainment. Clear Channel Communications acquired SFX and in 2005 spun off Live Nation.

The venue was developed for about $12 million. Indiana gospel singer Sandi Patti was the headliner when it opened on May 20, 1989.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • original name
    It may have been Indiana Fieldhouse at conception, but Conseco signed on before it was built, didn't they? So the building was never really built as Indiana Fieldhouse.
  • Conseco Fieldhouse orginal name
    A lot of people forget that Conseco Fieldhouse was originally called Indiana Fieldhouse before the Conseco deal. It wasn't Indianapolis Fieldhouse as pointed out above but it definitely was Indiana Fieldhouse before they made the Conseco deal. If I remember correctly, the Conseco deals run out relatively soon (next 8 or 9 years roughly) so it will almost certainly be something other than Conseco Fieldhouse before too long. Conseco doesn't have the money to retain the naming rights once the current deal runs out.
  • Fieldhouse
    It has never been Indianapolis Fieldhouse
  • Deercreek
    IT will always be deercreek to me. Especially if these places continue to play musical names. IRP, Indianapolis Fieldhouse, Hoosier dome and well i guess its always been lucas oil stadium.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT