IBJNews

Judge denies ex-Countrymark CEO’s release from prison

IBJ Staff
September 9, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A federal judge has denied former Countrymark CEO David Swanson’s request to be let out of prison until an appeals court hears his case for early release later this month.

The 68-year-old former financial executive is serving a 12-year sentence stemming from his 2002 conviction for wire fraud, money laundering and tax evasion.

A federal appeals court in Chicago has agreed to hear his appeal claiming that his lawyers were derelict in not seeking a mistrial after the government presented its case.

Judge Sarah Evans Barker on Thursday denied his request for release, citing prosecutors’ concerns that Swanson is a flight risk.

“We simply are not convinced, given Swanson’s record, if given the opportunity to flee as opposed to returning to prison, that Swanson will obey this court’s orders,” she wrote.

A jury found Swanson guilty in October 2002 of stealing $2.7 million from Countrymark, an Indianapolis-based agricultural cooperative, in the 1990s.

He failed to appear for sentencing in January 2003 and was apprehended in Seattle about three weeks later.

Prosecutors also said in their arguments opposing Swanson’s motion to be released that the likelihood his appeal will be successful is “meager.”


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Finally a decision well deserved
    Thank you judge Barker for not allowing this crook back on the streets!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....

ADVERTISEMENT