COTA: Website helps with difficult but important conversation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Jim Cota

Even in this age with people willingly sharing all kinds of things with one another on social networks, there is one area of our lives where we quiet down completely.

The topic is end-of-life care.

I’m guessing your reaction to the topic was to immediately think about what you could do for the next few minutes besides read this column. But stay with me: I’m going to give you the tools to make this almost as easy as discussing any other important issue. 

Some context: 80 percent of people say that, if seriously ill, they would want to talk to their doctor about end-of-life care, yet only 7 percent report having had that talk. And 82 percent say it’s important to put their wishes in writing, yet only 23 percent have done it.

In other words, if you’ve avoided this tough issue, you’re definitely not alone. The key, says Ellen Goodman, co-founder of The Conversation Project (www.theconversationproject.org), is simply talking about it. And the best place to begin is at your kitchen table—not an intensive care unit—with people you love, before it’s too late.

Why is this important? Imagine, for a moment, being seriously injured or ill, unable to speak for yourself, or facing the end of your life. Whom do you want standing at your bedside, speaking for you, making tough decisions about your care—perhaps even disagreeing with other family members or medical professionals about how you should be treated? Now that you have that person in mind, does he or she know how you feel? Does that person know what’s important to you?

Or maybe you’re in a position to make these decisions for someone else. In that case, do you know his or her wishes?

The Conversation Project offers a “starter kit”—available online and as a downloadable file—with a list of questions to first ask yourself to be sure you understand your own feelings on the issue. The questions are simple but thought-provoking. Some are scaled (e.g., “How involved do you want your loved ones to be?”) while others are fill-in-the-blank (“What matters to me at the end of my life is ____”)

Once you’ve completed the preparation, you have to talk with someone, share what you think and how you feel, and ensure that your wishes will be adhered to in the midst of a challenging, emotionally charged situation.

Starting this conversation will be the most difficult step. (I’ve found that it’s tough writing about it, even in an abstract sense.) But having this conversation can be liberating for you both. It will give you the peace of mind that someone will be prepared to make your wishes known, and you will have the information you need to reciprocate.

The Starter Kit equips you to have this conversation with all the important people in your life and prepares each of you for the acceptance necessary to make it work. Following the conversation, the kit provides some valuable next steps: documents you should have on hand, further clarifying questions to deal with specific cases, and more.

If you’re still on the fence about whether this is important, consider one more item: 70 percent of people would prefer to die in their homes. The reality is the exact opposite: 70 percent die in a hospital, nursing home or long-term-care facility. 

Wherever you are on the spectrum, whatever your wishes for your own care, however you’d like to be treated, make your wishes known. The Conversation Project can help you do just that.•


Cota is president and co-founder of Rare Bird Inc., a marketing communications firm specializing in Internet application development. His column appears monthly. He can be reached at jim@rarebirdinc.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.