IBJNews

WellPoint draws criticism for California rate increase

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WellPoint Inc.’s plan to raise the rates that small employers in California pay for medical insurance was criticized as unreasonable by the state insurance commissioner, who said customers are being charged this year to cover U.S. health-law fees that won’t begin until 2014.

WellPoint’s Anthem Blue Cross unit in California is raising those rates an average of 10.6 percent, Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones said Tuesday at a news conference. Indianapolis-based WellPoint sells small group policies that cover 284,000 California employees, including 54,000 whose policies will renew this month and would immediately be affected, he said.

WellPoint overstated future medical use and cost trends and shouldn’t have included next year’s fees as justification for the increase, Jones said. The commissioner provided his findings last month to the insurer, which plans to proceed with the rate increase. WellPoint’s proposed 39-percent rate increase in 2010 was criticized by politicians and advocates, who said it spurred support for President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act.

“Anthem Blue Cross’s return on equity or profit has been and continues to be excessive,” Jones said.

Anthem Blue Cross said rates will go up an average of 6.5 percent and the increase is lower than not-for-profit competitors.

“The rate increases in the small group market are not unique to Anthem Blue Cross, but rather represent an economic reality faced throughout the entire industry as health-care costs continue to escalate faster than our state’s economy as a whole,” Kristin Binns, a WellPoint spokeswoman, said in an e-mail.

WellPoint, the second-biggest U.S. health insurer by market value, reported gross profit of $13 billion in 2011, or about 21 percent of revenue, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The company owns Blue Cross plans in 14 states. UnitedHealth Group Inc., based in Minnetonka, Minn., is WellPoint’s larger competitor.

WellPoint shares were up $1.06 Wednesday morning, to $61.12 per share, an increase of 1.8 percent.

The 2010 health law will impose a sales tax on insurers that starts at $8 billion in 2014.

California’s insurance commissioner can only review rate increases and doesn’t have the authority to stop those deemed excessive. Jones said 37 states have the power to halt unreasonable rate increases.

Aetna Inc. CEO Mark Bertolini said last month that health insurance premiums may as much as double for some small businesses and individual buyers next year. The Affordable Care Act is expected to extend health coverage to about 30 million people who otherwise couldn’t get insurance, partly paid for by new taxes and fees on health-care companies.

Around the country, Aetna, UnitedHealth, Centene Corp. and other health insurers have proposed large increases on small businesses and individual buyers in recent months, citing rising costs for medical care and greater requirements of the health-care law. The Obama administration has said provisions in the law have kept increases from being even higher.

In other WellPoint news, the company confirmed that it still expects to name a new chief executive officer this quarter, said interim chief John Cannon.

Cannon said a CEO would be named “hopefully sooner rather than later.” He spoke at a health-care conference in San Francisco sponsored by JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Cannon has served as the interim head of the Indianapolis-based company since the departure of Angela Braly in August. He said in October that the search for her replacement might stretch into this quarter.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. OK Larry, let's sign Lance, shore up the PG and let's get to the finals.

  2. A couple of issues need some clarification especially since my name was on the list. I am not sure how this information was obtained and from where. For me, the amount was incorrect to begin with and the money does not come to me personally. I am guessing that the names listed are the Principal Investigators (individual responsible for the conduct of the trail) for the different pharmaceutical trials and not the entity which receives the checks. In my case, I participate in Phase II and Phase III trials which are required for new drug development. Your article should differentiate the amount of money received for consulting, for speaking fees, and for conduct of a clinical trial for new drug development. The lumping of all of these categories may give the reader a false impression of physicians just trying to get rich. The Sunshine Law may help to differentiate these categories in the future. The public should be aware that the Clinical Trial Industry could be a real economic driver for Indiana since these revenues supports jobs and new job creation. Nationally, this account for 10-20 billion which our State is missing out on to a large degree. Yes, new drug and technology development has gotten most of the attention (e.g. CTSI, BioCrossroads, etc.) However, serious money is being left on the table by not participating in the clinical trials to get those new drugs and medical devices on the market!!!! I guess that this is not sexy enough for academia.

  3. The address given for the Goldfish Swim Club is the Ace Hardware, is it closing?

  4. Out of state management and ownership. If Kite controlled it, everything would be leased. Of course, due to the roundabout, there is limited access to the south side of 116th now also. Just have to go down to the light.

  5. Hey smudge, You're opposed to arresting people for minor crimes? Sounds great! We should only focus on murders and such, right? Let's stand around and wait until someone shoots someone before we act. Whatever we do, we should never question anyone, frisk anyone, or arrest anyone unless they are actively engaged in shooting or stabbing. Very sound!

ADVERTISEMENT