IBJNews

WellPoint helps usher in health care reform

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Year In Review

After eight months of grueling debate, health care reform looked stymied in January after the victory of Scott Brown in Massachusetts gave Senate Republicans enough votes to filibuster the bill. But then President Obama revived the bill by seizing on news of sharp premium hikes on individual customers by Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc.

CEO Angela Braly was dragged before a congressional committee, and Democrats regrouped to push the bill into law. Obama signed it March 23.

WellPoint was later blasted by critics of the law for its ham-handed public and government relations—things that were touted as Braly’s skills when she was named CEO in 2007.

“It’s been a disaster,” said Bob Laszewski, an insurance consultant in Alexandria, Va. “It’s hard to believe retrospectively in her expertise in public policy.”

WellPoint officials said Obama and his administration had “targeted and villainized” the company to rally support for health insurance reform.

The law itself is a mixed bag for WellPoint and its peers. On one hand, the law requires all Americans to have health insurance and will pay more than $40 billion a year in subsidies to help an extra 16 million Americans to buy coverage.

Already, however, WellPoint and its peers face many new regulations on their businesses. They can no longer reject customers because they’re sick and cannot cap customers’ benefits via lifetime maximum provisions.

Also, health insurers must spend at least 80 percent of the premiums they collect—and 85 percent for large-employer accounts—on medical care, potentially limiting their profits.

Lower profits and more complex regulations will lead many smaller insurers to sell to larger ones, and WellPoint executives say they expect to be active in acquisitions in the next few years.

Having an estimated 32 million new Americans with insurance coverage drew support for the law from Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co. and the pharmaceutical industry. But new industry fees, larger Medicaid rebates and other provisions now have analysts expecting it to trim pharma profits.

The law also approved new methods of paying doctors and hospitals, which has accelerated a trend of doctor-hospital mergers.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT