IBJNews

Brizzi controversy colors prosecutor's race

Cory Schouten
December 24, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Year In Review

A Democrat is set to take over as Marion County prosecutor after 16 years of GOP dominance, following an election in which the outgoing Republican prosecutor factored large even though he was not on the ballot.

Two-term Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi drew attention for a series of questionable business deals with a local defense attorney and for his friendship and business ties to financier Tim Durham, who is under federal criminal investigation.

The FBI also was looking into deals involving Brizzi—including a state lease deal in Elkhart and an Indianapolis drug case—following an IBJ investigation that raised questions about his business dealings while in office and whether those deals influenced his actions as prosecutor.

Local defense attorney Paul Page in 2008 arranged for Brizzi to own 50 percent of an office building in Elkhart leased by the Department of Child Services without Brizzi’s putting up cash or credit. A year later, Brizzi offered a lenient plea deal and returned $10,000 in seized cash to accused drug dealer Joseph Mobareki, a Page client.

Law enforcement officials saw Brizzi’s intervention in the Mobareki case as troubling considering his no-cost real estate deal with Page in Elkhart.

During the election, both the victorious Democrat Terry Curry and Republican challenger Mark Massa criticized Brizzi’s behavior in office.

Curry put it this way: “There’s no doubt whatsoever that the No. 1 challenge for the next prosecutor is … to restore trust and confidence in the office.”

Massa, a former general counsel for Gov. Mitch Daniels and deputy prosecutor in Marion County, began his campaign by calling on Brizzi to resign. In April, Massa announced a series of ethics reforms he hoped to enact if elected, and said the man he hoped to replace should resign before his second four-year term ended Dec. 31.

Massa cited a series of “disturbing published reports” detailing Brizzi’s business dealings while in office, including the investment with Page.

“I believe the prosecuting attorney should inspire public confidence, not public cynicism,” Massa said. “I will work simply for the paycheck from the people every two weeks, and I’ll work hard to earn it.”

Brizzi resisted calls from former supporters to resign, and had a personal interest in sticking around: By finishing his second term, he will be eligible for a public pension.

With eight years of service, he would be entitled to earn 24 percent of his highest annual salary of $125,000, or about $30,000 per year once he reaches retirement age, by IBJ’s calculation.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Will Terry Curry initiate insider trading case against Brizzi
    Mr Curry please pull Brizzis records and note his massive position in CLST Holdings, acquired shortly before Indianapolis based Brightpoint bought them, as well as what appears to be about 1Million shares of an alleged boiler room stock, Red Rock Pictures, acquired not long before Daniel Laikin was arrested for boiler rooming that same stock. Dan Laikin is Tim Durham's partner and is the brother of Brightpoint CEO Robert Laikin, Dan currently in federal prison over securities charges on Lampoon stock, the charges against him on Red Rock dropped in return for his guilty plea.

    So, why isn't Brizzi charged with insider trading? I'd like to see where Brizzi got the money to buy CLST so if you investigate this make sure you ask him for the cancelled checks cuz I have a hunch he doesn't have them and that Tim bought the stock for him, which if true means Carl would be part of Tim's "investment group" and required to be listed in SEC 13d filings (which did not happen.)

    Also Mr Curry, could you get to the bottom of why that Page guy allegedly showed up in bankruptcy court claiming he was broke when he is netting like just under $200K on that triple net lease (tenant, the state of Indiana, pays 100% of all costs, maintenance, taxes etc) on that building he scored up in Indinaa. Not sure what Brizzi's cut of that amount is but it's enough to let that bankruptcy judge know. Thanks Mr. Curry.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT