IBJNews

WellPoint pays big to tap fast-growing Medicare market

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Analysts raised their eyebrows at the $800 million reportedly paid by WellPoint Inc. to acquire a West Coast Medicare plan, but with the commercial health insurance business stagnating, Medicare is vital to WellPoint’s future growth.

Indianapolis-based WellPoint will acquire California-based CareMore, which operates senior-focused medical clinics and covers about 55,000 seniors under the Medicare Advantage health plan, in which the federal government contracts with private health insurers to cover seniors’ health care. CareMore has doubled its customer rolls in the past four years.

“WellPoint acquired an attractive business that has grown substantially in the past few years, but they paid up to do it,” Citibank analyst Carl McDonald wrote in a June 8 research report about the deal. He and other analysts noted that the reported purchase price, which WellPoint would not confirm, punches out to nearly $15,000 per insured customer.

Previous acquisitions of Medicare Advantage plans have been priced at an average of less than $6,000 per insured member.

Of course, CareMore also operates a series of senior-focused medical clinics in six counties in California, as well as newer operations in Arizona and Nevada. WellPoint said it will invest any profits from CareMore—which analysts estimated at $30 million to $50 million annually—into launching more clinics in 2012.

Also, WellPoint can tap the experienced managers at CareMore to help grow its heretofore lackluster Medicare Advantage business, noted Barclays Capital analyst Joshua Raskin.

WellPoint provides health insurance to 33 million Americans—more than any other company. But it has only about 550,000 members in its Medicare Advantage plans, ranking fourth nationally. According to analysts’ estimates, Medicare Advantage accounts for less than $5 billion of WellPoint’s nearly $60 billion in annual revenue.

WellPoint CEO Angela Braly acknowledged during a February conference with investors that WellPoint has struggled at capturing Medicare customers in the past, and signaled the company was likely to make an acquisition to help it grow in that segment.

“We think Medicare, demographically, is an opportunity for us. We haven’t captured the market share that we could there,” WellPoint CEO Angela Braly told investors in February.

She also laid out WellPoint’s projections that, by 2015, employer-sponsored plans nationally will actually lose 5 million members while Medicare plans add 19 million members.

Raskin, writing in a June 8 research note, said the CareMore management team should be able to help WellPoint do a better job capturing that growth.

He wrote that WellPoint “has spoken on numerous occasions about pressures on its earnings in that [Medicare Advantage] segment in recent years. It appears that there has been a lot of volatility in that segment’s contribution historically. We believe that the CareMore team will bring much needed experience, strategy and operational focus.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • well of course...
    ...Anthem wants to profit off Medicare, like any good crony capitalist company they want to suck as many $$$$ off the govt. teat as possible, the don't call it WELL-fare for Repuglicans fer nothin'...it's who they are, it's what they do!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

ADVERTISEMENT