IBJNews

WellPoint pledges two-day hospital stays after mastectomy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In its latest response to withering criticism of its breast-cancer policies, WellPoint Inc. said it will pay for breast cancer patients to stay two days in a hospital after mastectomy surgery.

The Indianapolis-based health insurer is effectively putting into practice, as of June 1, the primary provision of a bill called the Breast Cancer Patient Protection Act, which has not passed both houses of Congress.

The main sponsor of the bill, Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., wrote on May 20 to WellPoint CEO Angela Braly asking her to commit WellPoint to the substance of the legislation.

“I hope you will join in publicly extending this very basic consumer protection—the guarantee of 48 hours in the hospital following breast cancer surgery—to the patients you insure,” DeLauro wrote.

Some states already require insurers to cover hospital stays of 48 hours if the patient and her doctor wanted that much time for recovery after mastectomy surgery. But now, WellPoint officials said, the company will make the policy standard for its customers in any state.

"Women recovering from breast cancer surgery, in consultation with their physicians, will decide whether hospitalization for 48 hours is required," Dr. Sam Nussbaum, WellPoint’s chief medical officer, said in a statement. "We are committed to making medical coverage decisions for women with breast cancer that are in accord with the latest scientific evidence and clinical research. It's important for us and our members that WellPoint continues to lead in this area.”

WellPoint has been under fire since an April Reuters article said the company uses a computer algorithm to target breast cancer patients for cancellation of their policies. WellPoint has repeatedly called the article’s claims “inaccurate and grossly misleading.”

But the article provided the basis for sharp criticism of WellPoint from President Obama, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and dozens of members of Congress. In addition, many WellPoint customers called the company concerned about their vulnerability to cancellation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT