IBJNews

Workers sue 10 hotels, allege wage violations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Attorneys for workers at downtown Indianapolis hotels filed a federal lawsuit on Monday alleging wage and hour violations.

The suit targets 10 major hotels along with Hospitality Staffing Solutions, a subcontractor that employs many hotel workers, according to a prepared statement from the plaintiffs.

The suit, filed on behalf of 14 individual plaintiffs, alleges the hotels and HSS regularly failed to pay employees for all the hours they worked and forced them to work off the clock without breaks.

Attorneys hope to have the suit certified as a class action. They say hotel workers could be entitled to as much as $10 million in back pay.

The case appears to be timed to capitalize on the national spotlight on Indianapolis because of next month’s Super Bowl. The statement says hotels will make millions of dollars because of the event but that workers earn as little as $7.25 an hour and receive few benefits.

A phone call seeking comment from HSS was not immediately returned.

The suit makes the allegations against the JW Marriott, Indianapolis Marriott Downtown, the Canterbury Hotel, the Conrad Indianapolis, Embassy Suites Downtown, Holiday Inn Select Indianapolis Airport, Hyatt Regency Indianapolis, Hyatt Place Indianapolis Airport, the Omni Severin and the Westin Hotel.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Will Never Make It to Trial
    This tactic will die a slow death. All this is about is the Union trying to make a big splash leading up to the Super Bowl. At the end of the day, these folks will fail, the union will leave them holding the ball, and they will be out of work, marked and labeled as "Trouble Makers - Do Not Hire".
  • Right to work state
    This is the very reason why these people need to be repsented by someone who will back them up against this kinda of tactics, I know they broke the federal law but without being repsented by someone most of the time there afraid to come foward, this is the very reason we dont need to become a right to work state, our state has always been solvent an leads the midwest as one of the leaders in jobs, why change when its working.
  • Extortion
    This action is an example of union tactics. If these people aren't on the job during the SB week, they will lose a ton of money from loss of tips. However, the union leaders don't want to tell the employees that; they only want to exercise their power for legislative reasons - for example: the proposed right to work - drop that and the union will drop the potential of a work stoppage by the hotel employees. This is how union leaders operate. They can't function on economic reality because the reality doesn't fit their ideology. This is the same as Obama's goals. It doesn't matter that economic reality doesn't fit his ideology, the ideology is the only thing that matters.
  • JERRY
    Why are you attacking the right to work law? This has nothing to do with that. These companies are violating FEDERAL LAW! A company wanting employees to under report their hours or under paying them is a matter of federal law and not state law! Why do i feel like this is an indication of our public school system than anything. haha
  • workers sue hotels
    By the Time this come's to trial.
    Mitch Daniels will already have a right to work bill past and this is exactly what we was saying either you do it on their time or work for less no and by the way sorry u have to work sunday to

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

    2. Shouldn't this be a museum

    3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

    4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

    5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

    ADVERTISEMENT