IBJNews

WRTV up for sale

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

New York-based McGraw-Hill Cos. said Tuesday it plans to sell its nine television stations, including WRTV-TV Channel 6 in Indianapolis.

The company owns four ABC affiliates, located in Indianapolis, Denver, San Diego and Bakersfield, Calif., and five smaller and less-valuable Azteca America-affiliated stations in San Diego, Bakersfield, Denver and Fort Collins and Colorado Springs, Colo. It isn’t clear whether McGraw-Hill intends to sell the stations as a package or piecemeal. It hired Morgan Stanley & Co. to pursue the divestiture of its broadcasting group.

WRTV employees were informed of the planned sale Tuesday morning. WRTV General Manager Larry Blackerby, who took over for the retiring Don Lundy in January, referred questions to McGraw-Hill’s New York office.

“The planned divestiture is part of a continuing portfolio review that McGraw-Hill is undertaking across the enterprise to re-evaluate its strategic core and ensure it is appropriately allocating capital to generate shareholder value,” the company said in a news release.

Even though the value of network affiliates has dropped in recent years and WRTV has lagged its major competitors in local TV news ratings—a major revenue generator for stations—industry sources don’t think McGraw-Hill will have any difficulty selling the local ABC station.

“Indianapolis [has been] a Top 25 market,” said Bruce Bryant, president of Indianapolis-based Promotus Advertising. “There’s still tremendous value in the station.”

Bryant said the sale will have little impact on ad agencies, media buyers and other marketers that may look to Channel 6 for ad placement.

“McGraw-Hill has historically been very conservative with its TV stations,” Bryant said. “They haven’t always invested in their TV product the way other [TV] companies have. If anything, this change could be a blessing for WRTV. It could free up WRTV to be more aggressive in programming, marketing and community outreach. I know the management there wants to do that, but I think McGraw-Hill has held them back.”

Founded in 1888, McGraw-Hill is far better known—and makes far more money—as a book publisher than a TV station operator. With leading brands including Standard & Poor’s, McGraw-Hill Education, Platts energy information services and J.D. Power and Associates, McGraw-Hill has about 21,000 employees in more than 280 offices in 40 countries.

Sales in 2010 were $6.2 billion. The company said broadcasting-division revenue amounted to $100 million, less than 2 percent of the total.

“Part of the problem is McGraw-Hill just doesn’t have the focus on TV that it needs to at this time to make it work,” Bryant said. “It’s the same problem Emmis had. TV is a business that you have to be all in or not at all. Frankly, I’m surprised McGraw-Hill stayed in television as long as they did.”

Indianapolis-based Emmis Communications Corp. in 2005 started selling off its TV stations to concentrate on its core business, radio. Its 16 stations sold for $40 million to  $217.5 million each. The least expensive station was located in Hawaii; the most expensive was in Orlando, the nation's 20th-largest television market. Indianapolis ranks 27th.

The impact the sale will have on WRTV's operations isn’t clear, said Bill Cahoe, director of Ball State University Teleplex, which operates public station WIPB-TV Channel 49 in Muncie.

“It’s really impossible to say what will happen locally until we know who the buyer is,” Cahoe said. “I’m sure it’s a bit unsettling to the employees there.

"Some jobs could be lost if a conglomerate buys the station and centralizes certain operations. And there’s always the possibility that a new owner will want its own management. You’d think reporters, engineers and many of those in sales would be safe.”

So far this year, WRTV has hired a new general manager, news director and sales manager.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Plus, a little of NBC (Jay and Law and Order-SVU)
    Any chance the station will just close down?
  • What?
    What is this WRTV you speak of? Does anybody even watch and/or care about "local" TV? Certainly the Nielsen ratings reflect that fact and I can't name one on-air personality...oh wait, Clyde and Dianne!!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

  2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

  3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

  4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

  5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

ADVERTISEMENT