IBJNews

2010 CFO OF THE YEAR: Edward J. Bonach

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Top Honoree, Public Companies

It seems appropriate that on May 11, 2010, the company formerly known as Conseco changed its name to CNO Financial Group. The name change put the cherry on top of a transitional phase that carried it, in half a decade, from bankruptcy to solvency. Much of the credit for that revival belongs to Edward J. Bonach, CNO’s executive vice president and CFO.



CNO, a holding company for a myriad of insurance firms operating across the United States, was muddling through some very hard times when Bonach signed on in 2007, shortly after the firm (then known as Conseco) emerged from bankruptcy. His chief tasks included getting the company out of uncertain, unprofitable sectors of the insurance market, and setting a course toward solid financing and future growth.

“Risk and capital management has been a priority for my 2 ½ years here, and it will continue to be a priority,” Bonach said.

bonach-factboxA team of six professionals reports to him, and he has direct responsibility for 200 more—not surprising considering the company’s growth. Conseco expanded rapidly in the 1990s, acquiring 44 separate insurance companies. This created a corporate entity that was extremely complicated and difficult to manage.

One of Bonach’s first tasks was spinning off the company’s volatile Long Term Care business to a private trust, reducing the company’s exposure to that sector. This was accomplished just in time to face the next crisis—the financial meltdown that began in autumn of 2008. The company saw a precipitous fall in the value of its investments, a situation exacerbated by the fact that Conseco, having recently emerged from bankruptcy, was undercapitalized. Bonach was nevertheless able to renegotiate the company’s credit agreements, providing critical breathing space.

Since then the firm has taken steps both to refinance CNO’s debt and strengthen its capital position, including completing a public offering of CNO common stock with net proceeds of more than $220 million, and a private offering of $293 million of convertible debentures. Bonach has also undertaken company-wide efforts to, among a great many other things, reduce operating costs, streamline administrative procedures and consolidate back office operations. All of which helps reassure outside observers that CNO’s comeback is for real.

“One of our biggest tasks is getting investors and other stakeholders to recognize the fundamental changes and improvements in CNO and to not continue to look at us through the lens of the past,” Bonach said.

That happy state of affairs may have already come about. Early in 2009 the company’s stock dipped to an abysmal 26 cents. Since then it has rebounded into the $5 range. CNO has also strung together six profitable quarters.

As the company regains its footing, Bonach continues a major drive to consolidate its dozens of holdings down to three divisions: one for career agent distribution, one for independent distribution and one for direct marketing.

His biggest achievement is helping to return the company to consistent profitability. His biggest challenges this year have been dealing with the sluggish economy and persistent low interest rates.

But there may be an ace in the hole. Baby Boomers keep getting older. The older they get, the better CNO’s prospects will become. “I believe that we will continue to build on our positive momentum and are poised to profitably grow even faster as the first of the Baby Boomers begin to turn 65 in 2011,” Bonach predicted.

Those Boomers—otherwise known as middle-income Americans primarily ages 65 and older—are CNO’s target market.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Not Surprising!
    I have known Ed for many years. He has always been an overachiever.
    Please join me in congratulating him and in wishing him continued success.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

  5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.

ADVERTISEMENT