2010 CFO OF THE YEAR: J. David Maas

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Honoree, Not-For-Profit

Like most not-for-profits, the Lumina Foundation for Education was hit hard by the recent economic downturn. But while the agency was forced, of necessity, to hunker down a bit to weather the storm, it hasn’t backed away from its ambitious goals—goals whose financial execution relies on the continued guidance of treasurer and CFO J. David Maas.

cfo-maas-dave03-15col IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter

That’s a good thing, because Lumina’s plans for Indiana (and the nation) could be instrumental in giving Americans the educational tools they’ll need to succeed in the 21st century.

Lumina’s mission is to increase access to and success in post-high school education, especially among adults, first-generation college students, low-income students and students of color. In 2009 alone it disbursed $55.6 million in grants, many directed toward traditionally underserved students.

maas-factboxThe organization was able to keep its eye on the education ball—even during the Great Recession—thanks in large part to Maas’ sound stewardship of its financials. Especially its large endowment. Lumina was founded in 2000 when USA Group Inc., the nation’s largest guarantor and administrator of student loans, sold to Sallie Mae. The proceeds of the sale established the USA Group Foundation (renamed the Lumina Foundation for Education shortly thereafter), endowing it overnight with a breathtaking $770 million.

The recession knocked the wind out of Lumina’s assets. In December of 2007 assets totaled more than $1.4 billion. By December of 2008 that total plunged to approximately $990 million, before recovering to roughly$1 billion by December of 2009.

At its lowest ebb, Lumina’s portfolio shed 40 percent of its value. Throughout the precipitous fall, Maas stuck to his investment strategy, which helped the foundation maintain liquidity and stability at a time when other not-for-profits sold assets at fire-sale prices or borrowed money to meet day-to-day needs. “While we did reposition some investments, we didn’t panic and cash out,” he said.

The recession wasn’t the only financial turmoil Maas faced. In 2009 Lumina’s chief investment officer resigned, prompting a thorough reassessment of the portfolio’s management.

Maas’ responsibilities include, among many other things, financial analysis, tax planning and preparation, human resources and facilities services. He even serves as program officer for several Lumina grants, giving him the opportunity to work “in the trenches.”•


  • Well-deserved recognition
    Dave Maas is a very skillful numbers guy and deeply loyal team player and leader. It is great to see a good man receive the credit he so deserves.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.