IBJNews

2011 Health Care Heroes: Samantha Backhaus

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Health Care HeroesFINALIST: Advancements in Health Care

Samantha Backhaus, PhD

Clinical Neuropsychologist, Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana

 

backhaus-samantha (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

In 1999 Lisa Thompson, M.D., suffered a traumatic brain injury, or TBI. After hospitalization, the mother of four received six weeks of rehabilitation and made a “miraculous” recovery, eventually returning to her pediatric practice. But her emotional suffering hadn’t healed. Five-and-a-half years later, she took her life.

Unfortunately, Lisa’s story isn’t unusual. More than 75 percent of TBI patients develop major depression. They are four times more likely than other people to commit suicide. Neuropsychologist Samantha Backhaus, Ph.D., is working to improve those odds.

“This was a very powerful message to me, Backhaus said. “We know that people who do not deal with their emotional crises and challenges after an injury, and who perceive a very poor quality of life, have a much worse rehabilitation outcome. I really feel passionate about trying to help patients create new meaning in their lives and find success.”

Backhaus created a manual and training program, Brain Injury Coping Skills Group, to educate TBI survivors and their family members. The 16-week program focuses on brain injury education, recovery expectations, management of daily challenges, stress management and the signs and symptoms of depression, which can crop up years after the injury.

Her research reflects the way the Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana approaches its work—moving beyond merely compensating for the injury.

Her work attracted interest worldwide. She has trained professionals from the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Brooks Rehabilitation Facility in Florida and Sunnas Rehabilitation Hospital in Oslo, Norway.

Those are among the facilities that participated in a multi-center study from 2007 to 2009 to determine the effectiveness of brain injury coping skills. The BICS participants scored significantly better than a control group on the concept of perceived self-efficacy.

The study, which was published in the American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, also found that the non-BICS group got significantly worse three months later. This study garnered Backhaus the 2009 McDowell Award for Best Clinical Science in Early Career. She was also awarded a research grant from the Indiana Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Trust Fund, which funded the next phase of her study.

In Phase II, Backhaus measured BICS against a self-directed support group. Both groups scored high on self-efficacy, although BICS proved better for patients with anger control, initiation and impulsivity issues.

“Everybody wants to think they have created a treatment that is a magic solution,” Backhaus said. “This was a wonderfully humbling experience that reminded me that one size doesn’t fit all.”

To date, approximately 300 people have completed the BICS program at RHI and there is a waiting list. Backhaus is very excited about the hope she has inspired in TBI patients.

“Dr. Backhaus lives through it with these patients,” said Jim Graham, executive director of the Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana Foundation. “It’s not just the pure research that motivates her. She’s doing this out of sheer compassion and caring and a desire to help make their lives better.”•

____

Click here to return to the Health Care Heroes landing page.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

ADVERTISEMENT