Big Ten officials will give serious consideration to changing the conference’s name now that the University of Nebraska
has been added as a 12th member.
Sources within the Big Ten said a decision could come as early as this fall, but added that a verdict may not come until
a year from now, when the Big Ten finalizes its “expansion study.”
There are two options Big Ten officials are studying, a source with knowledge of the discussions said. One is a name that
reflects the number of members and the other is a name with no numerical reference that could remain stable even if the Big
Ten decides to expand beyond 12 teams—which the source said is a distinct possibility.
“It’s something we’re going to have to figure out over the next few months,” Big Ten Commissioner
Jim Delany said of the Big Ten’s moniker.
But Delany said a name change isn’t a certainty.
“When Penn State was added [in 1993], I presumed we’d have a different name,” he said. “I found out
pretty quickly that Big Ten was a name that carried a lot of meaning to a lot of people.”
The conference, founded in 1895 as the Intercollegiate Conference of Faculty Representatives, also has been called the Big
Nine at various times in its history depending on member fluctuations. It was first called the Big Ten in 1917 and has held
that name steadily since 1949.
One thing prompting a name change is confusion with the Big 12 Conference, which will have 10 teams when Nebraska departs
for the Big Ten and the University of Colorado leaves for the Pac 10 in 2011.
“The Big Ten will have 12 members and the Big 12 will have 10 members,” said Jimmie Tramel, who covers the Big
12 for the Tulsa World. “It’s time for both leagues to pick a name that isn’t false advertising.”
There’s little doubt the Big Ten will have to change its logo, which has an 11 incorporated into the design.
But local sports marketer David Morton thinks there’s a big risk in the conference's changing its name.
“Once you re-brand, you have to re-position and establish that new identity in the marketplace. That’s a re-education
and can be very time-consuming and expensive, said Morton, president of locally based Sunrise Sports Group.
“You have so much brand equity in that name, I’m not convinced changing the name is a good thing,” Morton
added. “It’s a tribute to this conference’s roots and what it has stood for historically.”

















IBJ Conversations
43 Comments
Add Comment
I think we need to change the conference name. I dont get how it will hurt the recognition of the conference, if anything it will make this conference more recognized. The Pac 10 changed to the Pac 12. I like the Big North (BNC) or North East Confernce (NEC), you have the (SEC). the SEC & (NEC) would mirror eachother pretty much
BIG NORTHERN = BIG norThErN.
BIG TENX (Big Ten Expanded)
BIG WESTERN NORTH
BIG EXTENDED
In the future, children will learn to count nine, twelve, eleven, ten, thirteen, and so on...
I do agree dropping B10 is going to hurt recognition for awhile.
Greater than or equal to 10 or =>10
Approximately 10
Conference?
Notorious Big?
Big Flyover Country Conference?
Big Ten (Give or Take)?
Love stinks, Yeah, Yeah......