Biglari adjusts controversial pay proposal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The parent company of Steak n Shake restaurants has scaled back a controversial pay package for its CEO in hopes of securing shareholder approval of the plan at a rescheduled special meeting.

Biglari Holdings Inc. canceled the previous meeting, scheduled for Aug. 24, to "correct misinformation," answer questions from shareholders and analysts, and incorporate suggestions into an incentive package for Sardar Biglari, the company's chairman and CEO.

The revised package would pay Biglari the equivalent of 25 percent of the company's annual growth in adjusted book value above a 6 percent threshold, up from 5 percent in the earlier version. The new deal also caps Biglari's annual incentive pay at $10 million, but still requires him to spend at least 30 percent of his annual incentive payment buying Biglari Holdings shares in the open market.

The new meeting is scheduled for Nov. 5 in San Antonio.

Biglari Holdings revealed details of the new incentive pay arrangement in a proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Sept. 29.

The filing says the company's annual goal for book-value growth is 10 percent. Based on a book value of $300 million, if the company achieved that 10 percent target, Biglari would earn an incentive bonus of $3 million. That is in addition to an annual salary of $900,000.

Biglari Holdings also addressed criticisms of the incentive plan from shareholders and proxy advisory services that previously recommended a no vote. The companies, including Institutional Shareholder Services, warned the company could manipulate the book-value metric upward without shareholders seeing any benefit, for instance, by issuing new shares to fund an acquisition. Another concern: Measuring book value growth is not traditionally considered relevant in the restaurant business.

The company shot back that it is not a pure-play restaurant company, but rather a diversified holding company, and that "adjusted book value" would be calculated using only "items that add economic value to the company" and not financial engineering.

Any further changes to the agreement that would benefit Biglari would require shareholder approval, the document notes.

"The Company views its shareholders as true partners in the business and wants their questions and suggestions to be considered fully, clearly, and accurately," the filing says.

The company wants to redesign Biglari's pay package to reward him for a successful turnaround of the Steak n Shake chain, and acknowledge the company's transition into a diversified holding company and Biglari's responsibility for all investment decisions.

Negative reaction to the pay arrangement contributed to a swoon in Biglari Holdings shares, from a peak of $418 in early April. Biglari responded to the drop by buying up even more shares. He has spent more than $30 million buying shares this year alone.

Biglari likely would not have put forward the new agreement if he wasn't confident he'll have shareholder support to get it passed.

The shares were down about 2 percent in early trading Friday, to $322.43 each.

Motley Fool columnist Richard Gibbons called the original deal “one of the sweetest compensation arrangements I’ve ever seen at a public company”—one that would cut deeply into shareholder returns.

Ken Skarbeck, managing partner of Indianapolis-based Aldebaran Capital LLC and a columnist for IBJ, in August said the pay is too rich for such little growth. Paying Biglari 10 percent of an increase in the company’s annual book-value growth topping 10 percent would make more sense, he said.

“This guy’s trying to make 30 million bucks a year,” he said. “That’s ridiculous for some 30-year-old kid who’s running a restaurant chain.”

Biglari took over Indianapolis-based Steak n Shake Co. in a 2007 proxy fight, helped return its restaurants to profitability, then transformed it into a holding company for a diverse range of investments.

The renamed company, which relocated its headquarters from Indianapolis to San Antonio, has moved aggressively to invest or take over other firms, including a small Michigan insurer. The Steak n Shake restaurant operations remain in Indianapolis but are scaling back their office space in downtown's Century Building.


  • Why do we care?
    What is the IBJ's fascination with this guy?
  • Ken Skarbeck is a moron
    The pay is a little rich but what Biglari has already done has been fantastic. Had they hired someone else who performed worse, Starbeck wouldnt be saying anything about that guy getting a package worth $4 million a year.

  • victory
    So he gets what he wanted in the first place, but now it looks like a concession and the shareholders think they won.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.