IBJNews

Bill to drug test Indiana welfare recipients advances

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A legislative committee is backing a proposal to require drug testing for some Indiana welfare recipients despite complaints that it's unfair to the state's neediest residents.

The state Senate Health Committee voted 9-3 Wednesday in favor of requiring all applicants for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program to complete a written screening test for possible drug-abuse problems.

The bill approved by the House would require those later failing a drug test to enter a treatment program to keep receiving benefit payments. The Senate committee changed the bill to allow those on treatment waiting lists to remain eligible for benefits.

Testing supporters say it's aimed at helping those with drug problems and protecting children. Some faulted the proposal for not providing money for additional treatment programs.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Unforseen consequences
    The issue for me, other than costing taxpayers more than it saves them (see Florida), is that you further punish dependents of those abusing drugs. What do you do when a parent fails a drug test? Cut their benefits? Okay, how do their kids get fed when they have no means of providing food? Do the kids become wards of the state? That's the last thing the state or the kids need.
  • Most?
    Most companies drug test? Most companies randomly drug test? No. Most companies do not drug test. If you need a drug test to tell that someone is a bad employee you probably shouldn't be in management.
  • What a waste..
    What we know from previous attempts at this in other states is that the cost to implement the plan far exceeds the savings. But hey... don't let facts get in the way of making political hay and justifying racist and classist screed. http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/04/20/2758871/floridas-welfare-drug-tests-cost.html
  • Written???
    I am all for drug testing to be put in place to help alleviate some of the abuse our welfare system goes through. But a written test? Really??? Because everyone is going to be so honest??? Most people have to have to be drug tested before they are hired into a new company and most require random testing thereafter. If the general public has to sequester to drug testing to earn a paycheck then I don't understand why it is an issue to have someone tested for drugs in their system (randomly) before they qualify for our tax dollars to be handed out to them...
    • It's about time!
      I think it should extend to tobacco and alcohol. If you can afford cigarettes, liquor or illegal drugs, you sure don't need help from me!
    • Another test?
      A written test? Really?
    • Drug Testing
      There are people who use their cash assistance and food stamp cards to trade for drugs so I am all for it. They should also enforce the other regulations that already exist regarding number of people living in section 8 housing who are not on the lease. There are people out there who really need the assistance while they get back on their feet and there are others who make public assistance a career.
    • Test the Legislature
      I propose that all members of the State Legislature be drug tested every month. It seems to me that if we are looking to verify substance abuse we should start at the top and work our way to the bottom.
    • waste
      drug testing is the biggest waste of money and time. it proves absolutely nothing! cocaine can get our of your system in a day, same w/ most drugs. only drug that lingers around is pot, and marijuana laws need to be changed because its not a drug. there are many ways to pass these tests, its a joke they even require them for anything anymore
    • Weak law
      I have no idea why this is even an issue, there are no rules, allowing companies to work for the Feds on contracting jobs that say ANYTHING about a written test ! Random test are the only answer to find the real abuse of an absurd, ABUSED WELFARE SYSTEM ! Drug test rule should simply be,#JustDoIt pass you get help, fail,well.........!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT