Bill would shift tax appeals in property owners' favor

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A bill expected to be heard Wednesday in the Indiana House would give property owners appealing the assessed value of their homes or buildings more clout in the fight.

Senate Bill 381 would allow those going before a property-tax appeals board to use the median assessed value for properties similar to theirs as evidence their assessments – and therefore their bills – are too high.

The bill also specifies that the onus would be on the assessor to disprove the taxpayer, rather than vice versa.

Those pushing for the bill say it will help ensure taxpayers get a fair shot at making their case without relying on pricey property appraisals. But some county assessors and local-government advocates fear the bill could give taxpayers too much leeway to manipulate the appeals process – and add layers of work for assessors’ to disprove them.

Under the current system, if taxpayers can’t work out their appeals with the assessor’s office, they go to the county’s Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals for a ruling. According to the Department of Local Government Finance, property owners can use appraisals, sales data for similar properties, purchase offers and listing prices to make their case.

Unless the assessment has increased by more than 5 percent, the burden of proof falls on the taxpayer to disprove the assessment, which is based on home sales in the neighborhood.

The new law states that by presenting comparable properties’ assessed values, the taxpayer “prevails unless the assessor rebuts the taxpayer’s evidence with alternative evidence of comparable properties.”

“Some (assessors) across the state will dismiss a taxpayer out of hand,” said Rep. Bill Friend, R-Macy, the bills’ House sponsor. “We want to make sure taxpayers have full rights to take care of business if they think there’s an incongruity. We’re just trying to make sure they have the tools they need to make their case and be accurate.”

But some say such tools could be too strong.

For instance, if a taxpayer has a home that’s the highest in value in its neighborhood, that homeowner could find a few others that are similar in size and materials but are assessed at lower values. An assessor would have to use the median value of those lower-valued homes unless he or she can find other comparable properties with higher values.

“The taxpayer is going to pick those properties that give him the best advantage, which would probably not be reflective of market value,” said Stacey O’Day, an assessor in Allen County who has raised concerns about the bill. “Whatever the taxpayer brings in as evidence, we’d have to use the median they provide, period.”

The task of disproving taxpayers could become a time-consuming one, some say.

That’s because to determine a home’s assessed value, assessors don’t scrutinize individual properties. They look at the prices of homes that have sold in an area and estimate assessed values of homes in that area based on the sales data.

Counties such as Marion have resources to research properties whose assessments are in dispute and do so as a matter of course when the process reaches the appeals board. But for others, digging up such information would be an extra process they can ill afford.

“They would have to have staff going through sales disclosure forms,” said Andrew Berger, legislative director for the Association of Indiana Counties. “They don’t have staff to process appeals now.”

In fact, Marion County has a sizable backlog – currently about 29,000 appeals – that followed the property-tax fervor of 2007.

Marion County Assessor Joseph O’Connor said he’s not particularly concerned with having the burden of proof to disprove appellants.

But he does worry that those appealing their bills could make a case based on comparable homes’ assessed values, rather than sales data. That, he said, could make it tougher for the county to have homes’ assessments reflect how much they would sell for.

Despite the concerns, the bill is a bit of good news for some homeowners who have been frustrated with the current assessment system.

Russ Morgan, a northeast-side resident, is pushing to appeal both the way his home’s assessed value of just over $400,000 and others in his neighborhood were calculated.

While he doesn’t think the bill solves the systemic problems with the assessment process, he said it’s a step in the right direction.

In the current appeals process, “there’s no question that the onus of proof is on the homeowner,” Morgan said.

“(The bill) helps in the sense that it tells the assessor that the value is based on more than just his word.”


    I purchased a home on contract for me and my three children to get us out of a bad neighborhood. After using our back SSI money to do the plumbing, the electrical and the construction that was needed, I find out there has been a $7000 nuisance tax added to our property taxes which are due in November with me being resposible for those upcoming property taxes which I will never be able to pay... Now we will be left with nothing and someone else will get what we've worked ourselves sick trying to make for ourselves... I served as a volunteer for the State of Indiana's Indiana Guard Reserve for nine years standing on street corners doing security, helping whenever I could, now the State of Indiana is leaving us with nothing. Thank you for your support. I really appreciate it. We actually had the opportunity to move out of poverty, to not live on the support of a homeless provider, to become self sufficient although my son is autistic and I just recently had pancreatic surgery... Now, we will end up right back where we were because there is most likely nothing we can do to regain what we've lost... We almost had a chance to live in a neighborhood where we didn't hear screaming every day, where we didn't wonder whether every loud boom was a gunshot and where I didn't have to worry about my kids playing outdoors in the backyard at night... Now I'm going to have to uproot them again and find somewhere else on no money. I really appreciate what the State had done for us. THANK YOU!!! NOT.
  • Really??Tie our hands????
    Thank you Dan Te for actually commenting with a little common sense unlike the post you were responding to.
    Yeah thats exactly right Earl...if you don't know how property taxes work don't throw out your hate of Carmel just because you're too ignorant to understand how comparable properties and assessments are gathered.

    This article has nothing to do with lawmakers doing favors for their buddies in Carmel. Read the article again and slower this time, and no, you can't find an assessment three counties over who's house is valued at half the price. The whole idea of comparable residential homes is that they are in a similar area. Why do you think assessors do neighborhood sales studies.

    You're just another bitter fool that takes whatever subject is on the IBJ and spins it into you're own hatred for Carmel.

    I always find it funny how so many people think that everyone fom Carmel is rich and the rich live only in Carmel.
  • Are You Sure
    Does this mean the rich in Carmel will be able to down grade their homes value. Because they can show a house of simular size, in a different county sells for less. Are we sure the law makers are not giving their buddies a tax break?? Remember they will have their fancy lawyers argue it for them and somehow it will be to their advantage, you can bet on that.
  • Fair Values
    SB 381 would be a good thing. As far as providing "funding" in the wake of a disaster, it would help force county officials to realize that the citizenry is NOT the infinite piggy-bank that they always seem to think exists. Rusty bridges? Raise wheel taxes! Schools need NEW white boards? Raise property taxes! Need a new sewer line? Assess the property owners! What's that noise?! It's the pitter-patter of little feet, headed out of town, and that last remaining resident is going to have one nasty surprise as the local budget is balanced across his back.
  • Tax caps are going to tie our hands
    It is going to be horrifying when we actually need to raise revenue in a disaster or extreme situation and we can't raise property taxes because of the caps, and any reassessment is easily challenged by homeowners.

    Kind of like handcuffing yourself before you go surfing. Everything is fine at first, but when something goes wrong you are screwed.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.