Businesses walk fine line when supporting Colts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Scotty’s Brewhouse owner Scott Wise learned a costly lesson when the Indianapolis Colts last appeared in the Super Bowl and he tested the National Football League’s stringent trademark-infringement policies.

To celebrate the milestone in 2007, Wise had blue T-shirts printed with the number of a Colts player on the back and a horseshoe on the sleeve that he said differed from the team logo.

Wise even cleared the design with his attorneys to ensure the shirt he sold to patrons did not violate NFL rules.

Yet, even though the Colts team name never appeared on the garment, it caught the attention of the NFL, which showed no leniency.

Wise, who thinks someone forwarded to the league an e-mail of his promoting the apparel, received a cease-and-desist letter from officials. OK, fair enough, Wise said.

But the NFL also ordered him to return about 600 remaining unsold shirts at a cost of about $6,000, in addition to the $1,800 profit he had made. All told, including what he spent to have the shirts made, he lost between $10,000 and $12,000.

It’s a valuable lesson Wise won’t forget, and one fellow business owners undoubtedly will heed, if they haven’t already, as the Colts prepare to play the New Orleans Saints on Sunday.

“The whole thing to me is kind of frustrating,” Wise said. “I understand the NFL is trying to protect their brand and image. But the NFL wants to put their hands on everything.”

The league’s infringement policies, which are meant to protect authorized vendors and advertisers, have received nearly as much attention as the Super Bowl in the days leading up to the game.

That’s because a pair of young entrepreneurs printed T-shirts emblazoned with the “Who Dat” slogan, a decades-old rallying cry in Saints lore, accompanied by the team emblem.

After ordering them to stop selling the merchandise, the NFL softened its stance and allowed the shirts as long as they didn’t feature the team logo.

NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said in a statement that the league initially took action to “protect the local businesses that are selling legitimate Saints merchandise and also the local printers that are making the licensed Saints apparel.”

At last year’s Super Bowl in Tampa, counterfeit NFL gear was widespread, and hundreds of spectators left the game with cheap, fake football jerseys and merchandise, the Washington, D.C.-based International Trademark Association said.

The ITA estimated that about $1 million of phony NFL merchandise was sold at the game last year.

Tom Walsh, a partner within Indianapolis-based law firm Ice Miller LLP’s intellectual property practice, understands the NFL’s enforcement actions. He said they are levied to protect sponsors who pay big bucks to be affiliated with the league, or a particular team.

Sponsorship agreements often range in the hundreds of thousands of dollars and can reach into the millions.

“[The NFL has] a reputation of being aggressive in this area,” Walsh said. “The risk, though, of not being aggressive is pretty significant. [The NFL is],  in essence, a brand name.”

That’s why scores of businesses that are not officially affiliated with the Colts throw their support behind the team in generic fashion.

Motorists traveling along East 86th Street near the Monon Trail, for instance, see a blue Kroger billboard that simply says, “Go Team!” without any mention of the Colts.

And Taylor’s Bakery is selling blue and white, as well as horseshoe-shaped, doughnuts. The bakery purchased some pre-licensed, edible Colts images from the NFL to decorate cakes, but the expense prevented co-owner Matt Allen from purchasing more.

He declined to divulge the cost of the edible images, but he said the price for a sheet cake that typically sells for $24 rises to $39 when it features a Colts emblem.

A veteran of the bakery industry, Allen knows not to test the trademark waters, particularly when decorating cakes.

“It’s not just the Colts copyright, it’s Disney, it’s Nickelodeon,” he said. “They’re all very protective of their names. I’m just so used to it. It just doesn’t surprise me.”

Meanwhile, for Colts fans planning to patronize their favorite eatery or watering hole on Sunday, enjoy the “Big Game” festivities. That’s a popular term coined to promote the parties, since the NFL has trademarked the use of “Super Bowl.”

Scotty’s Brewhouse is being a little more daring, inviting customers to its "Super Party."


  • Playing by the rules...
    Another option is to call the Colts and partner up with them on a sponsorship package.

    Not free or real cheap but legal...and from my personal experience of two small businesses that sponsor the Colts...has paid dividends. Then as a business you will have access to "approved" logo's and articles that show your support of the Colts and their "partnership" with you either in a business to business setting or commercially.
  • Racketeering 2010
    It seems that this is 21st century version of Trust businesses we experienced at the end of the 19th Century. To say that we control your language, everything you do with a cha-ching charge is the same as Standard Oil, etc. telling their workers they must live in their homes, buy from their stores, use their own banks, etc. The NFL should only be in business for football and leave teeshirts, cakes, billboards, etc. to the "fans" they so deparately say they want.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............