IBJNews

Cash-strapped IndyGo planning to cut routes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Cash-constrained IndyGo on Tuesday announced proposed route cutbacks in response to its $3.2 million budget shortfall.

The city’s bus service receives about 30 percent of its $53 million annual budget from property-tax distributions, which have been reduced in part by property-tax caps.

Many of the proposed route cuts are on the east side of Indianapolis, including the elimination of the Route 87 Eastside Circulator.

In addition, IndyGo proposes to eliminate the Airport Express route on the west side in September, when its federal funding contract expires.

It also proposes cutting the popular bus service to Carmel and Fishers known as IndyGo Commuter Express, or ICE, when federal grants expire at the end of this year. That move was not unexpected, as federal money covers a large portion of expenses for the service.

Route changes and frequency adjustments constitute the bulk of the proposed changes.

IndyGo also proposes a fare increase, including bumping the single-ride cost to $2 from $1.75.

Two public hearings on the proposed changes are set for this Thursday at 11:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. at the Indiana Convention Center.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Public Input on IndyGo
    Nobody goes to Washington Square. How about having it at WPAC?
  • Revenue Source?
    The city should time deter use of vehicles and, at the same time, raise revenue by increasing the fees for parking meters, impose a tax on parking lots, increase parking tickets fees, speeding ticket fees, and deny building permits for construction of parking lots. Balance that with adding routes so more people can use them.
  • Pathetic
    This city's bus service is amongst the worst that I have seen. I say that we take the original "Hoosier Dome" 1 percent sales tax and allocate that toward the ailing, "minimalist" Central Indiana Transit plan. The CIB certainly doesn't know how to use it...

    Another issue is public input. Both sessions are downtown. If the East side is impacted, why not have at least one at Washington Square Mall?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

    2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

    3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

    4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

    5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

    ADVERTISEMENT