IBJNews

ChaCha apologizing for 'inflammatory' answers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Carmel-based ChaCha Search Inc., a question-and-answer service for mobile phone and online users, is apologizing for providing what it calls "inflammatory answers to questions asked about sensitive subjects."

The company issued a public apology Thursday after a report by online publication Gizmodo said ChaCha provided pro-life, racist and insensitive answers to some questions.    

"It was recently brought to our attention that ChaCha provided inflammatory answers to questions asked about sensitive subjects," the company said in a prepared statement. "We sincerely apologize for this incident. We are taking this issue seriously and are making every effort to provide answers which comply with our company policies."

The service relies on about 180,000 paid and unpaid "guides" to answer any question that a user might send in. Those guides typically tap a database to help them provide answers but sometimes answer the questions on their own.

"ChaCha is currently reviewing our database of nearly 2 billion questions and answers we have provided," the company said ."We are correcting answers which do not comply with our policies. In addition to cleansing our existing answers, we are implementing tighter policies and procedures. We are training all of our guides, support teams, and quality control teams to ensure the highest level of quality of our answers."

ChaCha was founded in 2006 by entrepreneur Scott Jones.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Inappropriate Twitter chatter too
    I recently called ChaCha out for their inappropriate and sexually suggestive tweets. I've also had difficulty getting correct answers from them. Buh-bye to ChaCha.
  • Frustrated as well
    I have never been able to get an accurate answer from Chacha on the first try. It is also extremely slow. Not sure why anyone would use this over other faster more accurate search engines
  • Did you read something different?
    Diogenes, the company did not call "pro-life" statements inflammatory. The IBJ article used the words "pro life."

    All, the company did, is what it should do which is apologize profusely for offending people with a program that offered statements that support an infamous apartheid proponent, Dr. Verwoerd, suggest that sometimes rape is justified, and quote Biblical text to people, not looking for it.

    If this is what you think is "insanity" then more companies need to behave insanely.
  • Pro-Life is Inflammatory? Really?
    You lost me there, Scott. The company statement in this regard is, to me, inflammatory and insensitive, and it stakes out a political position. An unwise business decision at best. Insanity at worst.
    • IPO
      Not to worry, they soon will have lost enough money and have enough consecutive years of losses to go public.
    • Gave up!
      I gave up on ChaCha after the creator of the software and engine was let go.
    • Not helpful
      I gave up on ChaCha after trying it a few times and never getting a single helpful or relevant answer.
    • What?
      Did the article just equate "pro-life" answers with "racist" answers? I can understand that Cha-Cha does not want to take a side in the "pro-life / pro-choice" public debate but the sentence in the article could have been better written
    • ChaCha
      I believe they are a company trying to make the internet more labor intensive.
    • Never heard of Cha Cha
      Who, or what, are they?
      • flawed concept
        The one time I used Cha Cha was to ask the score of an "Indianapolis Indians game" and was told the "Cleveland Indians did not play" that night. After repeated clarifications explaining different cities, different leagues but same name etc., the responder still didn't get and I finally turned to a local TV station website. I'll stick with Google.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

      2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

      3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

      4. Exciting times in Carmel.

      5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

      ADVERTISEMENT