LOU'S VIEWS: City Ballet off to stunning start

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

Is it possible to raise a bar too high?

That’s the question I was left with after the stunning “An Evening with the Stars” benefit for the would-be Indianapolis City Ballet on Sept. 12.

Without a corps of its own to take the stage, the ICB powers that be rounded up some of the top young dancers in the world, staging a can-you-top-this evening at the Murat Theatre that was rarely short of magnificent.

The program was, by turns (and sometimes simultaneously), gorgeous and funny and thrilling and jaw-dropping. It was moving. It was charming. And I can’t recall another time when I felt compelled to give a standing ovation mid-performance.

It’s probably a good thing that a significant amount of fund raising and organizational time must pass before Indianapolis City Ballet tries its own production. Following this would be impossible.

The evening started with a local tie—David Hochoy of Dance Kaleidoscope worked with dancers from the New York City Ballet and the American Ballet Theatre on an adaptation of his “Fascinatin’ Rhythm.” An unfortunate hiss in the sound system did diminish but didn’t destroy its introspective elegance. The leaps were lovely, the dancer-as-furniture moves stopped just short of being silly, and it seemed that everyone from the potential funders in the orchestra section to the student in the balcony was hooked.

At the Indianapolis City Ballet gala, David Hochoy choreographed New York City dancers. (Photo Courtesy Indianapolis City Ballet)

That hook went far deeper when Kirov Ballet dancers Anastasia and Denis Matvienko took a more traditional route with a pas de deux from “Diana & Acteon.” The thunderous applause barely died down before Stuttgart Ballet’s Alicia Amatriain and Jason Reilly showed us ballet’s possible future with “Mono Lisa” featuring ultra-precise, primal, extreme movements—and attitude to burn.


A Stuttgart Ballet duo was stunning. (Photo Courtesy Indianapolis City Ballet)

While on my feet, a sadness hit. Great art makes me generous, and I couldn’t help but think of the many people I know who would have loved being elevated and shaken by this combo of creativity plus excellence but who weren’t among the 1,850 other people at the Murat.

I also began to wonder what foolish programmer would put the best stuff right up front.

The fallacy of that thought was soon revealed. Excellence wasn’t a highlight of this program, it was an average.

Gennadi Saveliev from the ABT offered spirited spins on the traditional “Gopak.” Julie Kent and David Hallberg not only danced stunningly in the balcony pas de duex from Prokofiev’s “Romeo and Juliet,” but also gave acting performances that would shame most seasoned Shakespearian actors. Then, after intermission, Amatriain and Reilly returned for a truly hilarious “Le Grand Pas De Deux” set to Rossini’s music. When it comes to dance, “funny” usually means merely “amusing.” But the bespectacled ballerina and her earnest partner earned hearty, joyful belly laughs. Kudos, too, to choreographer Christian Spuck.

And there was more. ABT’s Sarah Lane and Gennadi Saveliev made one-handed lifts look simple and elegant in a piece from “Le Corsaire.” The Matveinkos threw themselves into a hyperkinetic “Radio & Juliet” (set to the music of Radiohead) and the Kent/Hallberg duo created more stage drama with a piece from “Manon.”

And then came Miquel Quinones.

I had heard about “Caught,” a signature work of Parsons Dance Co. But reading about it or watching a YouTube clip is nothing like experiencing it live.

It started with the dancer in circles of light. His movements indicated that he was preparing for something.

The lights strobed, catching him in a series of poses.

And then he flew.

Captured in the light at the apex of every leap, Quinones moved through the air, gracefully, impossibly. The piece carried with it the thrill of breaking boundaries and the ache of what we can’t do. I cannot praise it—or the performance—highly enough. It was transcendent. And the Murat shook with applause.

How do you follow that? The programmers tried with George Balanchine’s “Stars & Stripes.” But somehow mere excellence didn’t seem enough. The bar was too high.

Overall, a message was sent and it’s an exciting one: The goal of ICB, if/when it arrives, isn’t to create good-enough ballet. The goal is greatness.

As a presenter, that goal was achieved on the 12th.

It’s one thing, though, to present the best in the world, it’s another to create it.

But far more than I was a few weeks ago, I’m now anxious to see what our new ballet company can do when it’s ready to face the music and dance for itself.•


Visit ibj.com/arts for additional reviews, previews and arts discussion. Twitter: IBJarts




  • Wow. If Lou raves about something like this, then I'm betting it was indeed a home run. It sounds like it had so much of what is so often lacking in dance: Life, in its full range. Wish I could have been there.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.