IBJNews

Committee pushes gambling discussion to summer

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's riverboat casinos could receive tax breaks and be able to expand onto land under legislation the Senate Public Policy Committee debated Wednesday, but it won't happen anytime soon.

The panel didn't vote on the bill, however, which means it will likely head to a summer study committee for further discussion.

Sen. Phil Boots, R- Crawfordsville, called Senate Bill 364 a “very innovative idea” and stressed its importance as it pertains to Indiana’s gambling industry.

The bill would also authorize table gambling in racinos.

Competition to Indiana casinos has arisen from Ohio, which currently has six new venues drawing customers away from the Hoosier state.

“I think our operators are top notch, they just need the tools to compete with the rest of the world,” Boots said.

Indiana’s gaming revenue has been significantly declining in recent years.

In 2009, wagering at the casinos topped $2.8 billion. In 2012, it was $2.56 billion, an 11.8-percent drop.

Casino industry employment is also decreasing. In 2000, Indiana casinos employed 16,000 people, a number that has dropped to roughly 12,000.

“From a customer’s experience, you can’t compete with a land-based facility,” said Steve Jimenez, general manager of the Rising Star Casino (formerly the Grand Victoria Casino) in Rising Sun. “It gives us a good start to try to get to a level playing field.”

Jimenez also said that the legislation would help his casino bring business from out of state.

Committee Chairman Sen. Ron Alting, R- Lafayette, said he expected additional testimony from the owner of Rising Star – whom Alting referred to as “a brilliant mind in the field of gaming” – but the owner was unable to attend the meeting.

Alting did not bring the bill to a vote and referred the legislation to a summer study committee.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • hyperbole towards tea party
    Many of you leftists who comment here would be perfect candidates for another angry MSNBC prime time show. LOL
  • Yup.
    Agree with previous posters--we get to choke in the iron grip of blind morality until doing something else suits their fancy. Suddenly not so immoral to have table games once you start losing money, huh? This place is so backwards.
  • Easy man
    PJ, it's simple to understand. We have a right wing, tea party republican governor and a right wing tea party republican legislature. And, you have voters that vote Republican blindly and ignorantly. The result is the most oppressive state other than Iran. But keep pulling that Republican lever. At least Indiana has a world wide reputation for something.
  • WHY NOT
    I have a novel idea, why let the casinos have a land based operation, and let them have table games, and then worry about lower taxes after a two year period.
  • Why are we Morally Controlled?
    I never have understood and don't think I ever will understand why the State has laws against things such as these. This is obviously a moral based law. There is no reason people shouldn't be allowed to gamble their money however they want. Same goes with liquor sales on Sundays, Holidays and Election. Why?!?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

    2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

    3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

    4. Send them back NOW.

    5. deport now

    ADVERTISEMENT