IBJNews

Committee pushes gambling discussion to summer

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's riverboat casinos could receive tax breaks and be able to expand onto land under legislation the Senate Public Policy Committee debated Wednesday, but it won't happen anytime soon.

The panel didn't vote on the bill, however, which means it will likely head to a summer study committee for further discussion.

Sen. Phil Boots, R- Crawfordsville, called Senate Bill 364 a “very innovative idea” and stressed its importance as it pertains to Indiana’s gambling industry.

The bill would also authorize table gambling in racinos.

Competition to Indiana casinos has arisen from Ohio, which currently has six new venues drawing customers away from the Hoosier state.

“I think our operators are top notch, they just need the tools to compete with the rest of the world,” Boots said.

Indiana’s gaming revenue has been significantly declining in recent years.

In 2009, wagering at the casinos topped $2.8 billion. In 2012, it was $2.56 billion, an 11.8-percent drop.

Casino industry employment is also decreasing. In 2000, Indiana casinos employed 16,000 people, a number that has dropped to roughly 12,000.

“From a customer’s experience, you can’t compete with a land-based facility,” said Steve Jimenez, general manager of the Rising Star Casino (formerly the Grand Victoria Casino) in Rising Sun. “It gives us a good start to try to get to a level playing field.”

Jimenez also said that the legislation would help his casino bring business from out of state.

Committee Chairman Sen. Ron Alting, R- Lafayette, said he expected additional testimony from the owner of Rising Star – whom Alting referred to as “a brilliant mind in the field of gaming” – but the owner was unable to attend the meeting.

Alting did not bring the bill to a vote and referred the legislation to a summer study committee.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • hyperbole towards tea party
    Many of you leftists who comment here would be perfect candidates for another angry MSNBC prime time show. LOL
  • Yup.
    Agree with previous posters--we get to choke in the iron grip of blind morality until doing something else suits their fancy. Suddenly not so immoral to have table games once you start losing money, huh? This place is so backwards.
  • Easy man
    PJ, it's simple to understand. We have a right wing, tea party republican governor and a right wing tea party republican legislature. And, you have voters that vote Republican blindly and ignorantly. The result is the most oppressive state other than Iran. But keep pulling that Republican lever. At least Indiana has a world wide reputation for something.
  • WHY NOT
    I have a novel idea, why let the casinos have a land based operation, and let them have table games, and then worry about lower taxes after a two year period.
  • Why are we Morally Controlled?
    I never have understood and don't think I ever will understand why the State has laws against things such as these. This is obviously a moral based law. There is no reason people shouldn't be allowed to gamble their money however they want. Same goes with liquor sales on Sundays, Holidays and Election. Why?!?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

    2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

    3. Straight No Chaser

    4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

    5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

    ADVERTISEMENT