IBJNews

Constantino's and City Market reach settlement

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis City Market and anchor tenant Constantino's Market Place have agreed to an amicable divorce.

On Thursday, the two sides inked a settlement agreement in their dispute over $27,000 in unpaid rent. Constantino’s last day of operations in the market will be Dec. 24. The small business must remove its stand, equipment and belongings by Jan. 8.

“Both parties will part as friends,” said Constantino’s attorney Cliff Rubenstein, of Maurer Rifkin and Hill PC. “Constantino’s hopes the City Market is hugely successful in the future.”

Under the agreement, Indianapolis City Market Corp. will release Constantino’s from its obligation to pay its overdue rent. Riley Bennett and Egloff LLP partner Bryce Bennett, who represents the market, said there’s been “a lot of interest” from other potential tenants who could take over Constantino’s space. But no decision has been made on what will replace the stand, which sold fresh meats, cheese and produce.

“Litigation is an emotional as well as a financial drain,” Bennett said. “It’s just better at this point to agree to resolve it this way than to continue.”

Constantino’s ties to the City Market date back to 1911. Its owners, the Mascari family, closed their stand in 1996, but reopened it two years ago at the urging of market officials, who then expected a $2.7 million renovation of the main hall to bring back crowds. The Mascaris invested between $250,000 and $300,000 to build their 1,217-square-foot stand and install its refrigerated display cases.

In a Nov. 14 story, IBJ reported the 123-year-old City Market—which is now half-full, with only 25 tenants—had begun playing hardball with businesses in arrears, securing permission for Constantino’s eviction from Marion Superior Court Judge David Shaheed.

Constantino’s stopped paying rent 13 months ago, believing the terms of  its lease had been violated. After a hiatus, Constantino’s made partial payments in recent months. The business had argued it held exclusive rights to sell fresh fruit, vegetables and gift baskets in the City Market, and that the popular farmers’ market and several other stands violated its deal.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT