Daniels says investors overpaid on Indiana Toll Road

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels says foreign investors "overpaid" for their lease of the Indiana Toll Road five years ago.

The Spanish-Australian investor group Cintra-Macquarie is in danger of defaulting on loans it used in the 2006 toll road deal, according to a May article in The Financial Times.

IBJ reported in 2009 that toll road investors were struggling because of the economic downturn.

Their troubles mean the state got a better deal than it would have had it waited a few years to lease the toll road, Daniels said Wednesday.

"It means they overpaid," the governor said. "That's why you hold an auction, sometimes you hit the jackpot."

Daniels on Wednesday marked the five-year anniversary of the lease, and said the state is insulated from any financial problems under the deal it crafted.

Much of the money from the 75-year lease has already been spent on highway projects throughout the state, but $500 million was placed in an investment fund that collects interest to pay for future road construction.

In addition to making the state money, the lease also saves the state money by helping it avoid maintenance costs on the toll road.

Rep. Vernon Smith, D-Gary, said he opposed the leasing of the toll road in 2006 and still thinks that the state shouldn't have pawned off a valuable resource.

"We've got to understand, any time we get privatization people have to make a profit," Smith said. If they don't earn money, "we have a situation where we have an unstable commodity that we really don't have any control over."


  • A little story to contemplate
    I recently moved back to IN from Texas where the state was negotiating with Cintras/Macquire to build a series of highways called the Trans Texas Corridor. These are no ordinary highways. They're over 1/4 mile wide, with rights of way for toll lanes, pipelines, high tension wires and high speed rail. The idea was to take land from ranchers and other property owners and just hand it over to Cintras/Macquire to profit from. That's how government works in the USA these days, even in states like Texas that claim to be free. Here's the deal. The TTC was being built to help large corporations move cheap goods from Mexico into the US. That's the same reason they want I-69. Make no mistake about it. I-69 is not about your motoring convenience. It is about moving NAFTA goods from Mexico into the heart of the USA. It needs to be killed, just as Texans killed the Trans Texas Corridor
  • Nobody in No. Ind.
    Nobody in Northern Indiana uses the Indiana Toll Road. I lived there for years and everyone I know avoided it. That was back in the good old days. I can't imagine that much has changed.
  • So?
    So they default on their loans. That's their problem. They default and then the State gets to take the toll road back for free or for pennies on the dollar, and then elect to re-use the toll revenue stream.

    Hard to believe the investor group can't make it work. That road is in shambles and hasn't seen any improvements, and the tolls have all gone up. I would bet some execs have been living it up and have been abusing that cash cow.
  • Bad Deal
    Most of the money taken from the toll road is scheduled to go to Gov. Daniel's baby I-69 extension. This means we took a road that generated some revenue for itself to invest in a road that will generate no revenue for itself while people are still paying for the tolls on the origional road. He suckered people in northern Indiana by making them not only pay more for the toll road, but now they get to pay their taxes to take care of another road in Southern Indiana. Roads are a terrible investment which are garunteed to lose money and you Gov has made a living off of it. Good thing he has budddies in the road building industry to profit.
    • Brilliant move!
      Governor Daniels saved the state's economy with this visionary deal. He brought in several billion dollars which enabled us to improve our infrastructure, get out of debt, improve our credit rating and set the state on a path of financial viability. While our neighboring states are in the red and sending their governors to prison, we should be celebrating Governor Daniels and thanking our lucky stars that he is leading our state.
    • Underpayment Not Overpayment
      It's silly to say the investment group overpaid after only 5 years into a 75 year lease that has clauses that have built in toll rate increases that will make this very profitable after they recoup their required capital investment in 10 years.

      Short term cash flow problems after making long overdue capital investments are not a surprise.
    • Really!
      As the crossroads of America, should we not be continually upgrading our roads or infrastructure? Much of that transaction created a financial surplus, which has allowed Indiana to stay in the black for most of this economic downturn.
    • Not so bad
      Joe, there are some things you haven't considered in your scathing of the governor. First of all, the tollway was not at asset. It was a liability. It cost the taxpayers far more than they recieved in return. Cost of maintaining highways isn't cheap, and the tolls hadn't been raised in years. Second, Governor Daniels managed to get the investors to overpay for the tollway. Third, I'm not sure who you think builds and maintains the state roads, but that money comes from taxpayers. So when the governor built more roads (something I don't think we need, but oh well) he was spending the investor payment instead of taxes. The one point I agree with you on is that more roads aren't a panacea. We should have invested at least some of the money in transportation alternatives that can decrease demand for more road.
    • Daniels.....HA
      He is such a joke. We have built roads for decades and it hasn't exactly made Indiana the prime spot for business and qulity of life so what does our fearless leader do? He auctions off an asset and instead of using the funds to improve the state, he builds more roads to take care of............genius at work.

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

      2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

      3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

      4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

      5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.