EDITORIAL: Overspending saps nation's vigor

 IBJ Staff
February 20, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

To appreciate the gravity of the skyrocketing federal debt, and how much this year’s elections should focus on a fix, consider the zinger Gov. Mitch Daniels fielded on his trade mission to China last fall.

Daniels was imploring a major automaker to choose Indiana for its first U.S. office when the chief financial officer dropped this bombshell: The company wouldn’t consider an Indiana office—not because Indiana was a poor place to do business, but because it had no plans to operate in the United States, period.

Europe, not the United States, had the best growth prospects, the official said.

Why? America’s escalating debt.

Not all Chinese business leaders frown on U.S. prospects. As IBJ has reported, Chinese investors are providing badly needed capital.

But the debt clearly is becoming a big problem.

U.S. Sen. Evan Bayh has sounded an alarm for the past couple of years, and said during his retirement announcement Feb. 15 that an impasse over the deficit in the Senate was one reason he could no longer be effective in what once was considered the world’s greatest deliberative body.

The Office of Management and Budget projects federal debt held by the public to shoot from its current level of about 50 percent of gross domestic product to 85 percent of GDP by 2018. And the projection shows no sign of returning to Earth.

To put this in perspective, U.S. debt levels have ranged near 40 percent of GDP since the 1950s. Also, the international standard followed by the European Union and International Monetary Fund is 60 percent of GDP, a level we’re on course to crash through this year or next.

There will be consequences for inaction. Economic growth will slow and living standards will fall as Americans struggle to pay interest on the debt.

Chastened by a string of Republican victories, including Scott Brown’s election to Ted Kennedy’s former Senate seat in Massachusetts, President Obama has returned to talking up fiscal responsibility.

Many economists believe Obama did the right thing by pumping money into the economy to try to prevent a free-fall. But many of the same economists also warn that our free-spending ways cannot continue.

Given the intractable political rancor in Washington, Congress should reconsider handing the problem to an independent commission that can put forth a set of actions. As has been the case in the past with military base closings, Congress should require itself to vote the entire set of actions up or down.

Congress is resisting committing itself to such a commission because it fears it wouldn’t like the recommendations.

As we Hoosiers consider whom to send to Congress this fall, we should ask pointed questions and demand specific answers from candidates. A commitment to fiscal responsibility should trump grand plans that add to the deficit—and to the debt burden we’ll leave behind for our children and those of future generations.•


To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I had read earlier this spring that Noodles & Co was going to open in the Fishers Marketplace (which is SR 37 and 131st St, not 141st St, just FYI). Any word on that? Also, do you happen to know what is being built in Carmel at Pennsylvania and Old Meridian? May just be an office building but I'm not sure.

  2. I'm sorry, but you are flat out wrong. There are few tracks in the world with the history of IMS and probably NO OTHER as widely known and recognized. I don't care what you think about the stat of Indy Car racing, these are pretty hard things to dispute.

  3. Also wondering if there is an update on the Brockway Pub-Danny Boy restaurant/taproom that was planned for the village as well?

  4. Why does the majority get to trample on the rights of the minority? You do realize that banning gay marriage does not rid the world of gay people, right? They are still going to be around and they are still going to continue to exist. The best way to get it all out of the spotlight? LEGALIZE IT! If gay marriage is legal, they will get to stop trying to push for it and you will get to stop seeing it all over the news. Why do Christians get to decide what is moral?? Why do you get to push your religion on others? How would legalizing gay marriage expose their lifestyle to your children? By the way, their lifestyle is going to continue whether gay marriage is legalized or not. It's been legal in Canada for quite a while now and they seem to be doing just fine. What about actual rules handed down by God? What about not working on Sundays? What about obeying your parents? What about adultery? These are in the 10 Commandments, the most important of God's rules. Yet they are all perfectly legal. What about divorce? Only God is allowed to dissolve a marriage so why don't you work hard to get divorce banned? Why do you get to pick and choose the parts of the Bible you care about?

  5. Look at the bright side. With the new Lowe's call center, that means 1000 jobs at $10 bucks an hour. IMS has to be drooling over all that disposable income. If those employees can save all their extra money after bills, in five years they can go to the race LIVE. Can you say attendance boost?