IBJNews

Environmental groups lose in bid to stop I-69

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A federal judge has ruled against opponents of the $3 billion Interstate 69 extension between Indianapolis and Evansville who claimed the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers violated federal law by giving Indiana permission to fill wetlands and reroute streams along part of the 142-mile road.

U.S. District Judge Larry McKinney wrote in an order issued Tuesday that the Corps' decision to issue a permit was not arbitrary or capricious. He granted summary judgment to the Corps and the Indiana Department of Transportation.

The Hoosier Environmental Council and Citizens for Appropriate Rural Roads argued in their lawsuit the highway would cause "irreparable" environmental harm along a 26-mile section that would cross southern Indiana's Daviess and Greene counties.

A 70-mile section of the I-69 extension is expected to open late this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • 69
    You people just need to stop complaining about everything... You choose to live here. Let the state do what is best for the people. I bet you people complain about everything. Get a life.
  • Finally
    LandMine Of course missing from your argument is the fact that SR 37 between Bloomington and Indianapolis has one of the highest rates of accidents in the state and desperately needs to be upgraded to interstate standards and will only get worse in time as it inevitably becomes more congested. Additionally - without interstate access, Crane Naval Base is likely gone. With the upcoming interstate the base can be retained and comes the opportunity to add jobs for businesses that support the base in one of the poorest parts of the state that could desperately use jobs and hope
  • DRT.....
    whether swamp or wetland, this portion of earth plays a role so large in the overall ecosystem that you wouldn't be able to comprehend it. Abosrption of pollutants and chmicals in our waterways and habitat for a wide variety of animals, plants and insects will be wiped out........not that you care. There is always more, there is always more, there is always more, there is..........oh no!
  • It's a good thing!
    Hey, as a home owner in Greene County, I am extremely happy they have ran I-69 through Greene County. I can remember not too long ago worrying about the "Base Realignment and Closings" taking a hard look at closing Crane. The new I-69 route has played a role, if not a major role, in the decision to keep Crane open. Had the base closed, my wife - employed at Crane, would have lossed her job and my home, that I own in Bloomfield, would have devalued more than I care to even think about. With out the base the area would have literally dried up. But, since I-69 is being built and Crane is remaining open, we have seen more and more business coming to the area in the West Gate Park and in Bloomfield itself. If you own land in Greene County, you almost had to support this hi-way. It will protect the value of your property.
  • Quit fighting
    When will opponents quit claiming that it's only 15 minutes and the infrastructure was already there? As liberal as I am, I don't take lies by either party very well. I suggest you quit spewing your lies.
  • Name Change
    Remember when wetlands used to be called swamps? I guess trying to get people to save the swamps didn't have the same ring to it.
  • Pave Paradise
    This is sad news. When will humans stop paving over life, when one tree remains? All to save 15 minutes in travel time, big whoop! The much smarter alternative would have been to upgrade highway 41 and improve what we have already invested in.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    2. If you only knew....

    3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

    5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

    ADVERTISEMENT