IBJNews

  • Home

Environmental groups lose in bid to stop I-69

Associated Press
July 25, 2012
Keywords
Energy & Environment, Environment, I-69, Interstates/Highways, Law, Legal Issues, Transportation, Distribution & Logistics
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A federal judge has ruled against opponents of the $3 billion Interstate 69 extension between Indianapolis and Evansville who claimed the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers violated federal law by giving Indiana permission to fill wetlands and reroute streams along part of the 142-mile road.

U.S. District Judge Larry McKinney wrote in an order issued Tuesday that the Corps' decision to issue a permit was not arbitrary or capricious. He granted summary judgment to the Corps and the Indiana Department of Transportation.

The Hoosier Environmental Council and Citizens for Appropriate Rural Roads argued in their lawsuit the highway would cause "irreparable" environmental harm along a 26-mile section that would cross southern Indiana's Daviess and Greene counties.

A 70-mile section of the I-69 extension is expected to open late this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • 69
    RonNovember 2, 2012 10:38 AM
    You people just need to stop complaining about everything... You choose to live here. Let the state do what is best for the people. I bet you people complain about everything. Get a life.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Finally
    wl3048July 25, 2012 6:52 PM
    LandMine Of course missing from your argument is the fact that SR 37 between Bloomington and Indianapolis has one of the highest rates of accidents in the state and desperately needs to be upgraded to interstate standards and will only get worse in time as it inevitably becomes more congested. Additionally - without interstate access, Crane Naval Base is likely gone. With the upcoming interstate the base can be retained and comes the opportunity to add jobs for businesses that support the base in one of the poorest parts of the state that could desperately use jobs and hope
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • DRT.....
    JoeJuly 25, 2012 1:20 PM
    whether swamp or wetland, this portion of earth plays a role so large in the overall ecosystem that you wouldn't be able to comprehend it. Abosrption of pollutants and chmicals in our waterways and habitat for a wide variety of animals, plants and insects will be wiped out........not that you care. There is always more, there is always more, there is always more, there is..........oh no!
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • It's a good thing!
    I-69July 25, 2012 1:14 PM
    Hey, as a home owner in Greene County, I am extremely happy they have ran I-69 through Greene County. I can remember not too long ago worrying about the "Base Realignment and Closings" taking a hard look at closing Crane. The new I-69 route has played a role, if not a major role, in the decision to keep Crane open. Had the base closed, my wife - employed at Crane, would have lossed her job and my home, that I own in Bloomfield, would have devalued more than I care to even think about. With out the base the area would have literally dried up. But, since I-69 is being built and Crane is remaining open, we have seen more and more business coming to the area in the West Gate Park and in Bloomfield itself. If you own land in Greene County, you almost had to support this hi-way. It will protect the value of your property.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Quit fighting
    RSJuly 25, 2012 10:39 AM
    When will opponents quit claiming that it's only 15 minutes and the infrastructure was already there? As liberal as I am, I don't take lies by either party very well. I suggest you quit spewing your lies.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Name Change
    DRTJuly 25, 2012 10:06 AM
    Remember when wetlands used to be called swamps? I guess trying to get people to save the swamps didn't have the same ring to it.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Pave Paradise
    LandMimeJuly 25, 2012 9:55 AM
    This is sad news. When will humans stop paving over life, when one tree remains? All to save 15 minutes in travel time, big whoop! The much smarter alternative would have been to upgrade highway 41 and improve what we have already invested in.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    ADVANCED SEARCH
    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ

    1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

    2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

    3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

    4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

    5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

    ADVERTISEMENT