IBJNews

Ethics panel set to review Turner lobbying situation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana House Ethics Committee is set to review the actions of a senior lawmaker who worked in private to block legislation that would have cost his family's company millions of dollars.

Republican House Speaker Pro Tem Eric Turner fought a nursing home construction ban in the final days of the 2014 session. The Associated Press reported last week that Turner's 38-percent ownership stake in Mainstreet Property Group means he stands to receive $1 million or more on each new home that the company builds.

Turner has said he did nothing wrong and argues the ban wouldn't have caused him financial harm.

The ethics panel is scheduled to meet Wednesday afternoon at the Statehouse. House ethics rules place limits on official actions, but Turner's actions came during private meetings of House Republicans.

Lawmakers said last-minute lobbying and promises about job creation killed the nursing-home legislation.

The ethics panel could have trouble finding clear-cut answers, in large part because of unclear ethics rules and the Indiana General Assembly's status as a "citizen legislature."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Elected Officials vs Business
    Sipper Slope - You need a few lessons in representative government and business vs government. Subject matter knowledge is good but there is a difference from using subject matter to debate and craft good public policy and using an elected position to further your private interests behind closed doors. Corporations are not public entities and are a "for profit" enterprise; government is not. In addition, subject matter expertise can be brought to bear on public policy via open hearings conducted by the legislative committees of jurisdiction. Surely, you don't believe what you have written.
  • Slipper Slope
    Really, how short sighted can you people be? I suspect nearly all legislation benefits or doesn't benefit a business interest. So the insurance agent legislator should not bring his knowledge of insurance to discussions? So the street contractor should not bring his knowledge of street repair to the discussion? So the lawyer should not bring his knowledge of the law to the discussion? You need subject matter experts to assist in legislation and many of these legislators have this expertise. If Turner was on a corporate board, he would have a disclosure requirement and would be required to recuse himself on a vote but it would not prevent him from discussing the matter. Why should the legislature be any different than a corporate board? This is a slippery slope if you ban all private discussion in such a manner there will be no discussion.
  • Remove Turner from Leadership
    I agree wholeheartedly with AP. I would go a step further and recommend that Turner be removed from any leadership/committee head position.
  • 2 Things
    IC 2-2.1-3-7 provides that the ethics committee: (3) may recommend whatever sanction is appropriate with respect to a particular member as will best maintain in the minds of the public a good opinion of the conduct and character of members of the general assembly; and (4) may recommend legislation to the general assembly relating to the conduct and ethics of members of the general assembly. At the very least, Turner's actions should be publically condemned and legislation should be proposed banning legislators from private caucuses regarding a vote to which one of the caucusing members is prohibited from voting under the ethics rules.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

ADVERTISEMENT