IBJNews

Ethics panel set to review Turner lobbying situation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana House Ethics Committee is set to review the actions of a senior lawmaker who worked in private to block legislation that would have cost his family's company millions of dollars.

Republican House Speaker Pro Tem Eric Turner fought a nursing home construction ban in the final days of the 2014 session. The Associated Press reported last week that Turner's 38-percent ownership stake in Mainstreet Property Group means he stands to receive $1 million or more on each new home that the company builds.

Turner has said he did nothing wrong and argues the ban wouldn't have caused him financial harm.

The ethics panel is scheduled to meet Wednesday afternoon at the Statehouse. House ethics rules place limits on official actions, but Turner's actions came during private meetings of House Republicans.

Lawmakers said last-minute lobbying and promises about job creation killed the nursing-home legislation.

The ethics panel could have trouble finding clear-cut answers, in large part because of unclear ethics rules and the Indiana General Assembly's status as a "citizen legislature."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Elected Officials vs Business
    Sipper Slope - You need a few lessons in representative government and business vs government. Subject matter knowledge is good but there is a difference from using subject matter to debate and craft good public policy and using an elected position to further your private interests behind closed doors. Corporations are not public entities and are a "for profit" enterprise; government is not. In addition, subject matter expertise can be brought to bear on public policy via open hearings conducted by the legislative committees of jurisdiction. Surely, you don't believe what you have written.
  • Slipper Slope
    Really, how short sighted can you people be? I suspect nearly all legislation benefits or doesn't benefit a business interest. So the insurance agent legislator should not bring his knowledge of insurance to discussions? So the street contractor should not bring his knowledge of street repair to the discussion? So the lawyer should not bring his knowledge of the law to the discussion? You need subject matter experts to assist in legislation and many of these legislators have this expertise. If Turner was on a corporate board, he would have a disclosure requirement and would be required to recuse himself on a vote but it would not prevent him from discussing the matter. Why should the legislature be any different than a corporate board? This is a slippery slope if you ban all private discussion in such a manner there will be no discussion.
  • Remove Turner from Leadership
    I agree wholeheartedly with AP. I would go a step further and recommend that Turner be removed from any leadership/committee head position.
  • 2 Things
    IC 2-2.1-3-7 provides that the ethics committee: (3) may recommend whatever sanction is appropriate with respect to a particular member as will best maintain in the minds of the public a good opinion of the conduct and character of members of the general assembly; and (4) may recommend legislation to the general assembly relating to the conduct and ethics of members of the general assembly. At the very least, Turner's actions should be publically condemned and legislation should be proposed banning legislators from private caucuses regarding a vote to which one of the caucusing members is prohibited from voting under the ethics rules.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

  2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

ADVERTISEMENT