IBJNews

Turner says he didn't violate of House ethics rules

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

House Speaker Pro Tem Eric Turner stepped up to defend himself Wednesday against allegations that he improperly fought a nursing home ban that would have harmed his family's business.

Turner is the subject of a pending ethics hearing — one that could come as soon as the second week in April — into whether he violated ethics rules by lobbying against a nursing home ban in the final hours of the 2014 legislative session. Turner's son develops nursing homes throughout the state and his business would have suffered under a construction moratorium that was under consideration. The ban died in the final hours of the session.

Throughout the session, Turner withdrew from the issue in public, recusing himself from multiple votes on the issue. But Republicans said that he fought ardently in private meetings of the House Republican caucus to block the ban.

Turner did not directly address talks within the caucus Wednesday but said he was "extremely confident the House Ethics Committee will find I have acted within the rules of the House of Representatives, as I have for my entire 24 year career in the Indiana General Assembly.”

"My actions and statements on the nursing home moratorium issue during this last session were squarely within House Rules and the House Code of Ethics," Turner said in a prepared statement Wednesday. "I look forward to fully cooperating with the House Ethics Committee and I firmly believe once all the facts are presented, it will be determined that I acted well within the House Rules and the House Code of Ethics."

Turner issued his statement Wednesday through a private spokesman. He has also retained Toby McClamroch, a well-connected Republican inside the Statehouse, as his lawyer.

Wednesday's statement marked the first time Turner has weighed in on the ethics case since reports first surfaced last Monday. Democratic Party Chairman John Zody asked House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, to launch an investigation and Bosma replied last Thursday with a request that the Ethics Committee take up the issue.

House Ethics Chairman Greg Steuerwald, R-Avon, said he plans to hold a hearing once he has coordinated with the other members of the committee. That could come as soon as the second week in April, he said Wednesday.

It remains unclear, however, if anyone who was in the caucus meetings where Turner spoke will testify during the hearing. The caucus meetings, for members of both parties, are intensely private affairs even though critical decisions are often made there. It was in a private caucus meeting in the last few hours of the session that House Republicans decided to kill the nursing home construction ban.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • doj....
    Why go public in Canada and not the US of A...Ponder....Supporting US or Canada or something to hide...
  • connected
    Aug. 17, 2010 call to Dcs...Ponder it all
  • One more Concerned Citixen
    When I first read about the antics of Mr. Turner, it reminded me of the old Chicago machine during the Richard Daley days in the 60's. We will never know what was said in those private caucus meetings, but those attending sure do. They are the one's who have to live with themselves. I can't understand how they sleep at night! Politicians will be politicians.
  • Corruption
    Unfortunately, Turner will likely be absolved of any wrongdoing by his Republican peers. It will be yet another example of corrupt politics playing out. Is there really even a question anymore as to why the American public has grown so cynical when we keep having to endure politicians like this?
  • Confident
    I bet he is confident. His but it in my pocket buddies are on the ethics committee.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT