IBJNews

Former flight management firm owner pleads guilty to fraud

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The former owner and operator of an Indianapolis-based flight management services company pleaded guilty on Friday to charges of defrauding a charter airline in Rockford, Ill.

David A. Chaisson is one of two men charged in separate schemes to defraud Ryan International Airlines. James E. Murphy, the former owner and operator of a Florida aviation fuel supply company, also pleaded guilty to similar charges.

Prosecutors say the schemes involved kickback payments in exchange for business.

From January 2005 to July 2008, Chaisson paid a Ryan official more than $60,000 in kickbacks, including payments based on fabricated invoices submitted by Chaisson’s company to Ryan, according to court documents. Chaisson’s company was responsible for managing the ground operations for Ryan flights.

During the same years, Murphy paid more than $130,000 in kickbacks to the same Ryan official, who was responsible for procuring jet fuel for Ryan flights. In exchange, the Ryan official provided aviation fuel contracts to Murphy’s company and two other aviation fuel-supply companies where Murphy worked as a corporate bookkeeper, according to court documents.

Ryan International Airlines provides air passenger and cargo services for corporations, private individuals, professional sports teams and the U.S. government.

Both Chaisson and Murphy were charged in July with once count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and honest services fraud, as well as one count of wire fraud. Each count carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
 
The charges were filed in South Florida federal court. They are the first to arise from the Department of Justice’s ongoing investigation into fraud and anticompetitive behavior in the airline charter services industry.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT