IBJNews

Former flight management firm owner pleads guilty to fraud

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The former owner and operator of an Indianapolis-based flight management services company pleaded guilty on Friday to charges of defrauding a charter airline in Rockford, Ill.

David A. Chaisson is one of two men charged in separate schemes to defraud Ryan International Airlines. James E. Murphy, the former owner and operator of a Florida aviation fuel supply company, also pleaded guilty to similar charges.

Prosecutors say the schemes involved kickback payments in exchange for business.

From January 2005 to July 2008, Chaisson paid a Ryan official more than $60,000 in kickbacks, including payments based on fabricated invoices submitted by Chaisson’s company to Ryan, according to court documents. Chaisson’s company was responsible for managing the ground operations for Ryan flights.

During the same years, Murphy paid more than $130,000 in kickbacks to the same Ryan official, who was responsible for procuring jet fuel for Ryan flights. In exchange, the Ryan official provided aviation fuel contracts to Murphy’s company and two other aviation fuel-supply companies where Murphy worked as a corporate bookkeeper, according to court documents.

Ryan International Airlines provides air passenger and cargo services for corporations, private individuals, professional sports teams and the U.S. government.

Both Chaisson and Murphy were charged in July with once count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and honest services fraud, as well as one count of wire fraud. Each count carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
 
The charges were filed in South Florida federal court. They are the first to arise from the Department of Justice’s ongoing investigation into fraud and anticompetitive behavior in the airline charter services industry.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT