IBJNews

Groups ask for ethanol law break as corn hits record

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Livestock and poultry producers formally asked the Obama administration Monday to suspend the nation’s renewable fuels standard because it is causing “severe economic harm” as corn prices surged to a record.

A coalition including the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association and National Pork Producers Council sent a petition to the Environmental Protection Agency  asking for a waiver “in whole or in substantial part” the output requirements under the Renewable Fuels Standard for 12 months.

“An unsustainable situation has been created by the drought combined with the lack of cushion in corn supply due to the tremendous demand from ethanol producers,” Tom Super, a spokesman for the National Chicken Council, part of the coalition, said today on a conference call with reporters. “We believe that the RFS is causing severe economic harm during this crisis.”

The purpose of the livestock group’s petition is “short- term relief,” Thomas Elam, the president of consultant FarmEcon LLC in Carmel, said on the call.

The drought that sent corn prices to a record is devastating meat producers, and the demand for grain used to make ethanol is reducing available supplies to make food, the livestock groups said. The current mandate requires refiners to use 13.2 billion gallons of the biofuel this year and 13.8 billion in 2013.

It’s “time to wean” the ethanol industry off government mandates, J.D. Alexander, the president of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, said on the call.

“The higher-priced corn, the higher-priced cost of production, and higher cost of eventual products is going to be” passed along “to the consumer,” said Alexander, a Nebraska rancher who said he’s never seen anything like this drought in his 40 years in the business and added that he’s having trouble finding corn to feed his cattle.

The price of corn, the main ingredient in livestock feed, is up 61 percent since June 15 and reached a record $8.1775 a bushel Monday in Chicago as the drought erodes yield prospects for the crop that, last month, the government had forecast would be a record. About 64 percent of the contiguous U.S. is in moderate to severe drought as of July 24, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor.

Consumers may buy less meat as prices rise, John Burkel, the vice chairman of the National Turkey Federation and a Minnesota turkey grower, said on a media conference call. Stores are less likely to offer cheap turkeys during Thanksgiving this year, he said. While grocers typically advertise turkey at below cost to attract consumers for the entire holiday meal, retailers “can’t possibly continue doing that at these price levels,” he said.

Bob Dinneen, the president of the Washington, D.C.-based Renewable Fuels Association, the largest U.S. ethanol trade group, said in an e-mail that he expects the government to deny the waiver request.

“This summer’s hot, dry weather conditions have caused significant challenges for all users of grain,” including ethanol refiners, Dinneen said. “However, waiving the RFS won’t bring the type of relief the livestock groups are seeking, nor will it result in significantly lower feed prices.”

Ethanol producers have responded to higher costs by cutting output 17 percent, to 796,000 barrels a day in the week ended July 20 from a record 963,000 on Dec. 30. Poet LLC, is the largest U.S. ethanol producer, followed by Archer Daniels Midland Co., in Decatur, Illinois, and Valero Energy Corp.

Arkansas Governor Mike Beebe supports the concept of suspending the mandate, Matt DeCample, a spokesman, said Monday.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • 800 million gallons
    it does make sense that ending ethanol production will not result in a significant lowering of corn prices because excess corn has already been turned into ethanol, which of course is what the industry is saying, that there should be no need for concern because they have 800 millions gallons of it stored away,, normally that 800 million gallons of ethanol would be our corn stores for when we have a bad drought,, so instead of having a large amount of grain stores after a good year to help get us through hard times, we have a large amount of ethanol instead,, 800 million gallons, that’s a heck of a lot of ethanol, it’s as if they saw this drought coming and thought “hmm, a bad drought might mean starving people around the world and high food prices here at home,, that could spell trouble for the ethanol industry, perhaps we should buy the worlds corn supplies now and turn it into ethanol, then store it, I mean we can always turn corn into ethanol but they can’t turn ethanol back into food ”
  • Corn ethanol alternative
    This is an understandable request, if it can be proven that the cattle people are really hurting, instead of just whining that they might not make millions in profits this year. Perhaps this is a year they need to share their huge profits. Ethanol is a great alternative energy resource, it is what Henry Ford envisioned cars would run on. Unfortunately, corn is not an appropriate feed for ethanol. Perhaps this can encourage research into alternatives to corn for energy. I hope a solution can be found. Of course, I favor eating much less meat as a nation, but that won't happen. We need a alternative to corn, perhaps algae when drought conditions prevail. Lets keep ethanol alive in whatever form. It is a sustainable energy made in the USA and not the middle east or Canadian habitat destruction.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT