IBJNews

Habitat for Humanity builds green house in Cottage Home historic neighborhood

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Habitat for Humanity of Greater Indianapolis is building a house in the Cottage Home neighborhood that will boast several firsts.

The house in the 1300 block of East Ninth Street is the first low-income home in the state to achieve platinum LEED certification, according to Habitat. It’s also the first home the Indy Habitat chapter has built in a hi storic neighborhood and, thus, the first to be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission.

“The Cottage Home Neighborhood Association sold us the land,” said Dean Illingworth, executive director of Habitat for Humanity. “They invited us into the neighborhood.”

Cottage Home, developed by German immigrants in the 1870s through 1900, consists of about 150 houses east of Interstate 70 and west of Oriental Street, south of 10th Street and north of Michigan Street.

Habitat changed its standard design in several ways to fit in with the neighborhood—creating a steeper roof and adding extra windows, metal siding and roofing, and a gingerbread attic vent.

Achieving platinum LEED status was not much of a stretch, Illingworth said. The standard Habitat design is so energy-efficient, he said, that homes would likely qualify for the silver level of LEED certification. Building on an infill site alone scored big points with LEED, he said. The house also uses porous concrete, native plantings and a rain barrel.

Construction was scheduled to begin July 21. The Central Indiana Real Estate Investors Association donated labor.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT