IBJNews

Herb Simon purchases Kirkus book review journal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shopping mall magnate, NBA team owner and now a major player in the publishing industry.

Herb Simon, co-founder of Simon Property Group Inc. and owner of the Indiana Pacers, has bought Kirkus Reviews from New York-based Nielsen Co., which said in December that it would close the magazine.

Terms of the deal announced Wednesday were not disclosed.

Kirkus, a journal of prepublication book reviews, often is used by librarians and booksellers when deciding how to stock their shelves.

For Liz Barden, owner of the independent Big Hat Books in Broad Ripple, Simon’s purchase of Kirkus is immense.

“Every bookseller, every librarian, every educator, and people that are generally interested in the world of books, don’t go a day without reading their Kirkus daily,” she said.

The venerable journal was founded in 1933 but lately had become threatened by lackluster sales and online price wars occurring within the book industry.

In a statement, Simon acknowledged both the challenges and opportunities presented by the acquisition.

“With the growth of e-books and e-reading devices, no one can really see the future of publishing. But turmoil like this creates opportunities,” he said. “At a time when even the definition of a book is changing, my love of books makes me want to be part of the solution for the book publishing industry.”

Simon is no stranger to books. He is co-owner of an independent bookstore in Montecito, Calif., and is described by those who know him well as a voracious reader.

Barden at Big Hat Books does not know him personally but said she’s assisted several of his friends who buy for him at her store.

“It’s always an enormous challenge for me to figure out what he hasn’t read,” she said. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

  2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

  3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

  4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

  5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).

ADVERTISEMENT