IBJOpinion

HETRICK: America should encourage votes, not suppress them

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Bruce Hetrick

In 2004, back in the mundane political days before Barack and Hillary, John and Sarah, Mitt and Paul, my colleague, Lindsay Hadley, grew frustrated with the American electorate.

A designer, Lindsay fired up her Mac and created some get-out-the-vote advertisements.

Lindsay’s ads had strong headlines: “Too bad voting for an American president isn’t as important as voting for ‘American Idol’” and “Too bad Trump’s choice for an apprentice is more important than our choice for a leader.”

Lindsay offered her ads to Indianapolis print and broadcast media outlets, and earned herself some news coverage.

“I just don’t get it,” she told The Indianapolis Star. “If they have time to vote for that, surely they have time to vote for the American president.”

Back then, “American Idol” pulled 65 million votes during May alone—the majority for winning contestant Fantasia Barrino.

Meanwhile, The Star said we’d be lucky if one third of the 113,898 registered 18- to 30-year-olds in Marion County bothered to vote for George W. Bush or John Kerry.

Fast forward to 2012.

The headline story is no longer voter apathy. Alas, in a place where voter participation pales in comparison to other nations, state after U.S. state seems hell-bent on voter suppression.

In Ohio, state officials eliminated weekend voting hours—a convenience for working people, and (oh, by the way) for African-Americans more likely to vote after church.

When one Ohio county’s election board tried to continue weekend voting, the secretary of state moved to oust two of the board members.

In Florida, the governor has been trying to purge voter registration rolls.

Pennsylvania is fighting a court battle over a new voter ID law.

In Texas, where voter ID also faces a legal challenge, the state Republican Party’s platform calls for repeal of the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Indiana and Indianapolis offer their own vote-discouraging practices.

With voting hours that end at 6 p.m., Indiana has one of the earliest election-day cutoffs in the nation.

Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard’s office, which is responsible for polling locations in Marion County, nixed most of the satellite voting centers that proved popular in 2008.

Ballard’s office also moved 160 precinct polling places from one location to another—some that are difficult to reach on foot or by bus.

“Usually there’s somewhere between 15 and 30 polling-place changes total,” wrote Indianapolis Recorder columnist Amos Brown. “But this outrageously huge number of polling-place changes threatens real havoc, confusion and voter disgust. This impacts all parties, neighborhoods and races.”

Since the U.S. Supreme Court in 2008 ruled Indiana’s voter-ID law constitutional, similar measures have been all the rage.

The Philadelphia Inquirer reported earlier this month, “[U.S.] lawmakers proposed 62 photo-ID bills in 37 states in the 2011 and 2012 sessions, with multiple bills introduced in some states.”

“I very rarely see a single issue taken up by as many states in such a short period of time as with voter ID,” Jennie Bowser told The Inquirer. Bowser is senior election-policy analyst at the National Conference of State Legislatures, a bipartisan group that tracks state laws. “It’s been a pretty remarkable spread.”

The stated intent of these election-reform measures is to prevent voter fraud.

But in state after state, legislators are hard pressed to present any evidence of fraud having occurred. The Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law, for example, found that the voter fraud rate in Ohio’s closely contested 2004 election was .00004 percent.

Recent statements by two politicos suggest the real motive: suppressing the youth, minority and lower-income votes that skewed heavily toward Barack Obama in 2008.

In a late-May deposition reported by the Tampa Bay Times last month, former Florida Republican Party Chairman Jim Greer spoke of a meeting where he was “upset because the political consultants and staff were talking about voter suppression and keeping blacks from voting.”

Pennsylvania House Majority Leader Michael Turzai was even more blunt, when he boasted earlier this month, “Voter ID, which is going to allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania: Done!”

Like my friend Lindsay, I take pride in my right to vote. I’m embarrassed when I see pathetic U.S. election turnouts while citizens of third-world countries line up for miles, hours and even days to cast ballots and have their forefingers stained with ink that says, “I’ve voted already so I can’t vote again.”

Voter suppression, aimed at short-term gain for one party, endangers our democratic process and society.

We need more voters engaged, not fewer.

We need longer voting hours, with additional days and weekends.

We need online options.

We need multiple, accessible polling places and voting centers.

And yes, Lindsay, we need to motivate the American idle so our real elections trounce “American Idol.”•

__________

Hetrick is an Indianapolis-based writer, speaker and public relations consultant. His column appears twice a month. He can be reached at bhetrick@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Sad
    I noticed the polling place change when I voted in the primary. Instead of the easily accessible school down the street it was in a building way in the back of the fairgrounds with no sign indicating the correct place until I was almost on top of it. I actually had to stop at another polling location within the fairgrounds and ask directions. Also, as I was voting before work, it was dark, making it that much harder. If you don't get mad about any other issue this election, voter suppression by either party is just plain wrong. This is beneath our democratic process and a sad commentary on the lows the Republican party will sink to, to win this election. Instead of trying to appeal to those least likely to vote Republican, they continue to alienate, belittle, and demean those who they don't find worthy of their time to convince that maybe they do care, or they do have good ideas that would benefit all people. The GOP has gone over a cliff. I don't know how they can ever come back from it.
  • Overwhelm the suppression!
    Overwhelm the voter suppression! http://signon.org/s/oLaxc9 ACLU Protect The Vote Petition to Eric Holder: http://www.aclu.org/protectthevote

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT