IBJNews

High-deductible premiums rising, too

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The cheaper premiums for high-deductible health plans continue to boost their popularity among American employers and workers, but the growth of the plans’ costs are no different than that of other products.

High-deductible health plans, which are typically paired with a tax-free health reimbursement or health savings account, enrolled 19 percent of all covered workers this year, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation’s annual survey of employer health benefits.

That is up from 17 percent last year and from just 4 percent in 2006.

The reason for the plans’ appeal is not a secret: Average premiums for a high-deductible plan this year were $14,129 for family coverage—a savings of more than $2,200, or 14 percent, compared with the average cost of family coverage in a PPO plan.

Each insured worker sees about $700 of those savings—although the higher deductibles on the plans leave employees exposed to more out-of-pocket spending. Employers reap savings of more than $1,500, but many contribute to workers’ health spending accounts.

The average premiums for all plans this year were $15,745 for family coverage, an increase of 4.5 percent over last year.

Premiums for family coverage in a high-deductible health plan rose only 3.1 percent this year, but it was the first time since 2007 that premiums for the plans grew slower than health plans overall.

Since 2007, premiums for high-deductible health plans’ family coverage has grown a cumulative 32 percent, compared with 30 percent among all health plans.

If there’s a silver lining, it may be that high-deductible health plans are having at least a modest slowing effect on Americans’ use of health care services. Use of health care has been down during the recession and recovery of the last four years—even slower than can be credited to the recession alone.

“Health care use and the economy have always been closely tied, and my sense is that the recession and slow recovery are responsible for much of the recent health spending and premium trends. Increases in recent years in cost sharing through high-deductible plans have probably played a supporting role,” wrote Drew Altman, president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, in a blog post.

“In tough times, when wages are flat, people avoid using the health care system if they can,” he added. “We also know that higher out-of-pocket costs deter utilization, so it’s reasonable to assume that the growth of high-deductible plans and other forms of cost sharing has had an impact on health care use, magnifying the effect of the economy.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT