IBJNews

High-deductible premiums rising, too

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The cheaper premiums for high-deductible health plans continue to boost their popularity among American employers and workers, but the growth of the plans’ costs are no different than that of other products.

High-deductible health plans, which are typically paired with a tax-free health reimbursement or health savings account, enrolled 19 percent of all covered workers this year, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation’s annual survey of employer health benefits.

That is up from 17 percent last year and from just 4 percent in 2006.

The reason for the plans’ appeal is not a secret: Average premiums for a high-deductible plan this year were $14,129 for family coverage—a savings of more than $2,200, or 14 percent, compared with the average cost of family coverage in a PPO plan.

Each insured worker sees about $700 of those savings—although the higher deductibles on the plans leave employees exposed to more out-of-pocket spending. Employers reap savings of more than $1,500, but many contribute to workers’ health spending accounts.

The average premiums for all plans this year were $15,745 for family coverage, an increase of 4.5 percent over last year.

Premiums for family coverage in a high-deductible health plan rose only 3.1 percent this year, but it was the first time since 2007 that premiums for the plans grew slower than health plans overall.

Since 2007, premiums for high-deductible health plans’ family coverage has grown a cumulative 32 percent, compared with 30 percent among all health plans.

If there’s a silver lining, it may be that high-deductible health plans are having at least a modest slowing effect on Americans’ use of health care services. Use of health care has been down during the recession and recovery of the last four years—even slower than can be credited to the recession alone.

“Health care use and the economy have always been closely tied, and my sense is that the recession and slow recovery are responsible for much of the recent health spending and premium trends. Increases in recent years in cost sharing through high-deductible plans have probably played a supporting role,” wrote Drew Altman, president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, in a blog post.

“In tough times, when wages are flat, people avoid using the health care system if they can,” he added. “We also know that higher out-of-pocket costs deter utilization, so it’s reasonable to assume that the growth of high-deductible plans and other forms of cost sharing has had an impact on health care use, magnifying the effect of the economy.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT