IBJNews

High-deductible premiums rising, too

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The cheaper premiums for high-deductible health plans continue to boost their popularity among American employers and workers, but the growth of the plans’ costs are no different than that of other products.

High-deductible health plans, which are typically paired with a tax-free health reimbursement or health savings account, enrolled 19 percent of all covered workers this year, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation’s annual survey of employer health benefits.

That is up from 17 percent last year and from just 4 percent in 2006.

The reason for the plans’ appeal is not a secret: Average premiums for a high-deductible plan this year were $14,129 for family coverage—a savings of more than $2,200, or 14 percent, compared with the average cost of family coverage in a PPO plan.

Each insured worker sees about $700 of those savings—although the higher deductibles on the plans leave employees exposed to more out-of-pocket spending. Employers reap savings of more than $1,500, but many contribute to workers’ health spending accounts.

The average premiums for all plans this year were $15,745 for family coverage, an increase of 4.5 percent over last year.

Premiums for family coverage in a high-deductible health plan rose only 3.1 percent this year, but it was the first time since 2007 that premiums for the plans grew slower than health plans overall.

Since 2007, premiums for high-deductible health plans’ family coverage has grown a cumulative 32 percent, compared with 30 percent among all health plans.

If there’s a silver lining, it may be that high-deductible health plans are having at least a modest slowing effect on Americans’ use of health care services. Use of health care has been down during the recession and recovery of the last four years—even slower than can be credited to the recession alone.

“Health care use and the economy have always been closely tied, and my sense is that the recession and slow recovery are responsible for much of the recent health spending and premium trends. Increases in recent years in cost sharing through high-deductible plans have probably played a supporting role,” wrote Drew Altman, president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, in a blog post.

“In tough times, when wages are flat, people avoid using the health care system if they can,” he added. “We also know that higher out-of-pocket costs deter utilization, so it’s reasonable to assume that the growth of high-deductible plans and other forms of cost sharing has had an impact on health care use, magnifying the effect of the economy.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT