IBJNews

Hogsett takes position at Indianapolis law firm

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Joseph Hogsett, who announced his resignation as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Indiana earlier this month, is joining Indianapolis law firm Bose McKinney & Evans LLP, the firm announced Monday morning.

Hogsett, who plans to resign from his state post July 31, will join the law firm Aug. 1 as a partner in the litigation practice group, concentrating on internal investigations and corporate audits.

Democrat Hogsett, 58, has long been the subject of rumored bids for both Indianapolis mayor and U.S. senator.

His resignation letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, dated July 14, made no mention of why he decided to step down or his plans after leaving the office.

Hogsett was unavailable for comment Monday morning.

“I am pleased to join the practice of Bose McKinney & Evans, a firm that I have always respected and whose reputation for excellence in Indiana is well known,” Hogsett said in a prepared statement. “Perhaps most importantly, I have been thoroughly impressed by this firm’s long history of active engagement in communities statewide.”

Hogsett became U.S. attorney in 2010. The former Indiana Democratic Party chairman has previously lost three major elections: for U.S. Senate in 1992 against Dan Coats; for U.S. Congress in 1994 against David McIntosh; and for attorney general of Indiana in 2004.

He upset former Indianapolis Mayor Bill Hudnut in the 1990 election for Indiana secretary of state.

“Joe is an extremely accomplished attorney and we are thrilled to have him join our firm where his tremendous talents will be utilized to assist our clients,” Jeffrey R. Gaither, managing partner of Bose McKinney, said in a prepared statement.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Dont worry Todd 2015 will correct the council.
    with the obstructionist 4 at large seats gone next year the Council will be forced to listen to the people more and get things done. If it means Democrats lose the council then oh well it doesn't pay to hold our city hostage for political gain.
  • Corporate Law?
    Finally someone who is tough on crime and he resigns to join a corporate law firm?? What a waste, Joe. Please stay in the criminal arena and fight the good fight. We need you.
  • A commitment means nothing to Hogsett
    He said earlier this year he would continue as U.S. States Attorney through the end of his term. Not! He claimed recently that government fraud in Indiana was not safe from his investigations. Yawn. Another empty claim from one of Obama's 'picks'.
  • Ballard - NOT!
    Ballard will continue to give large tax breaks to every buddy (nee Republican) who wants to build something in Indy and each of us regular citizens will foot the bill. It's easy to build something when it's someone else's money doing it.
  • Meh
    Hogsett is a politician who over the last couple of years has run to find tv cameras every time he could present himself as some sort of super crime fighter. He has less ability to curb street crime in Indy than the current administration has though.
  • Record
    Another empty suit Dem. Running on a record he doesn't have.
  • If not....
    If he doesn't run Maria, don't worry we have Mayor Ballard who has done a great job of leading our city! If the council would get out of his way or start working together, who knows what this city could accomplish.
    • Run Joe Run!
      Joe, please please please run for mayor of Indianapolis. The city needs you!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

    2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

    3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

    4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

    5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

    ADVERTISEMENT