Indiana coal industry battling EPA plant limits

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Members of Indiana's coal industry and business community are heading to Chicago this week to fight against new limits on coal-fired plants they say would cost hundreds of jobs across the state.

The Environmental Protection Agency is considering cutting carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants as a measure to combat global warming. Opponents of the effort say more regulations will wreak havoc on the economy without having any meaningful impact on climate change, but environmentalists supporting the new limits say a burgeoning renewable energy industry would more than make up for any lost jobs.

If the EPA moves forward with the new set of regulations next year, existing coal-fired plants would have to find a way to limit carbon-dioxide emissions. Bruce Stevens, vice president of the Indiana Coal Council, said it would most likely force plants to consider using unproven technology to reduce emissions.

Carbon capture and sequestration mechanisms have been worked on for years, but none are commercially viable yet, he said. The end result would be a massive loss in jobs and increase in utility bills, Stevens said.

"I think there is a very real danger they will move forward with this," Stevens said Wednesday of the EPA.

The EPA is holding "public listening sessions" for now and has not yet started the lengthy process needed to create a new federal regulation. But the question weighs heavy on Indiana, which is a major coal producer and gets more than 80 percent of its electricity from coal.

Environmental groups supporting the new limits note it is too early to say exactly what any federal rule would look like, because it hasn't been formally drafted yet.

Jesse Kharbanda, executive director of the Hoosier Environmental Council, said there are a range of options available for reducing emissions.

He added that any loss in coal industry jobs could easily be offset by the creation of jobs building clean-energy components.

"The absolute issue is to think about the net impact on jobs in Indiana, otherwise we're presenting a distorted analysis," Kharbanda said.


  • What is wrong with you?
    Mr. Burton, I will throw the question back at you. What is wrong with you? At a time my health insurance costs have quadrupled, and not because of anything related to the air we breathe, and just about everything other expense has seen double digit, if not triple digit growth in expenses, why do you think it is ok to make energy EVEN MORE EXPENSIVE? In the last five years, I have watched most of my utility bills double and the proposed changes could quadruple the already doubled electricity bills. What universe do you live in with an unlimited income? If you want to pay more for electricity, please feel free to send them extra but please don't force me to pay more.
  • We All Breathe Same Air
    What is the matter which these people. Do they breathe different air from the rest of us. I for one would gladly pay more for electricity to get cleaner air, even if that included a cost to help the poor who cannot afford higher rates. Most people with whom I have discussed this issue of clean air vs higher rates would gladly pay for cleaner air.
    • Really now...
      "Bruce Stevens, vice president of the Indiana Coal Council, said it would most likely force plants to consider using unproven technology to reduce emissions._..._ Carbon capture and sequestration mechanisms have been worked on for years, but none are commercially viable yet, he said." --- Really now? When Indiana legislature was considering what to include as "renewable sources" in their tax credit legislation, I remember seeing a whole bunch of TV ads praising Clean Coal. The coal industry was saying that clean coal was a sure thing, worthy of credits. So, what happened? Other than you are getting paid to say whatever dung they ask you to spread?

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. what Steve is doing and if he is on another radio station. That is the station I will listen to.

    2. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

    3. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

    4. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

    5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.