IBJNews

Indiana coal industry battling EPA plant limits

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Members of Indiana's coal industry and business community are heading to Chicago this week to fight against new limits on coal-fired plants they say would cost hundreds of jobs across the state.

The Environmental Protection Agency is considering cutting carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants as a measure to combat global warming. Opponents of the effort say more regulations will wreak havoc on the economy without having any meaningful impact on climate change, but environmentalists supporting the new limits say a burgeoning renewable energy industry would more than make up for any lost jobs.

If the EPA moves forward with the new set of regulations next year, existing coal-fired plants would have to find a way to limit carbon-dioxide emissions. Bruce Stevens, vice president of the Indiana Coal Council, said it would most likely force plants to consider using unproven technology to reduce emissions.

Carbon capture and sequestration mechanisms have been worked on for years, but none are commercially viable yet, he said. The end result would be a massive loss in jobs and increase in utility bills, Stevens said.

"I think there is a very real danger they will move forward with this," Stevens said Wednesday of the EPA.

The EPA is holding "public listening sessions" for now and has not yet started the lengthy process needed to create a new federal regulation. But the question weighs heavy on Indiana, which is a major coal producer and gets more than 80 percent of its electricity from coal.

Environmental groups supporting the new limits note it is too early to say exactly what any federal rule would look like, because it hasn't been formally drafted yet.

Jesse Kharbanda, executive director of the Hoosier Environmental Council, said there are a range of options available for reducing emissions.

He added that any loss in coal industry jobs could easily be offset by the creation of jobs building clean-energy components.

"The absolute issue is to think about the net impact on jobs in Indiana, otherwise we're presenting a distorted analysis," Kharbanda said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What is wrong with you?
    Mr. Burton, I will throw the question back at you. What is wrong with you? At a time my health insurance costs have quadrupled, and not because of anything related to the air we breathe, and just about everything other expense has seen double digit, if not triple digit growth in expenses, why do you think it is ok to make energy EVEN MORE EXPENSIVE? In the last five years, I have watched most of my utility bills double and the proposed changes could quadruple the already doubled electricity bills. What universe do you live in with an unlimited income? If you want to pay more for electricity, please feel free to send them extra but please don't force me to pay more.
  • We All Breathe Same Air
    What is the matter which these people. Do they breathe different air from the rest of us. I for one would gladly pay more for electricity to get cleaner air, even if that included a cost to help the poor who cannot afford higher rates. Most people with whom I have discussed this issue of clean air vs higher rates would gladly pay for cleaner air.
    • Really now...
      "Bruce Stevens, vice president of the Indiana Coal Council, said it would most likely force plants to consider using unproven technology to reduce emissions._..._ Carbon capture and sequestration mechanisms have been worked on for years, but none are commercially viable yet, he said." --- Really now? When Indiana legislature was considering what to include as "renewable sources" in their tax credit legislation, I remember seeing a whole bunch of TV ads praising Clean Coal. The coal industry was saying that clean coal was a sure thing, worthy of credits. So, what happened? Other than you are getting paid to say whatever dung they ask you to spread?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    ADVERTISEMENT