IBJNews

Indiana Farm Bureau unveiling ads during Super Bowl

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It seems more and more insurance companies are taking to the television airwaves to promote their products in ad campaigns.

Who hasn’t seen the “Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there” or “We are Farmers” spots?

Add another campaign to the mix—this one developed by an Indianapolis agency and debuting during Sunday’s Super Bowl matchup between the Green Bay Packers and Pittsburgh Steelers. Super Bowl advertising is among the most-anticipated elements of the televised game.

Four different ads for Indiana Farm Bureau Insurance will be shown regionally during the matchup. The spots for the Indianapolis-based insurer are built around the slogan “stop knocking on wood.”

“Our campaign is tapping into what we found in our research—that most consumers aren’t all that up to speed on what type of coverage they have,” said Young & Laramore President Tom Denari. “When we asked them specifically, if they had a fire or accident, what would be covered, they clearly had no idea. They’re knocking on wood. They’re hoping it doesn’t happen.”

Indiana Farm Bureau signed a deal in August to make Young & Laramore its advertising agent of record. Farm Bureau officials said then that they discussed the job with several ad agencies, but chose Y&L because of the firm’s track record in Indiana and beyond.

Earlier last year, the firm recaptured the account for Columbus, Ohio-based Stanley Steemer, the nation’s largest flooring and upholstery cleaning company based on sales. And last month, it scored a national contract with Ohio-based Scotts LawnService.

The Farm Bureau ads feature real-life scenarios, such as what’s covered if an automobile is stolen or a wedding ring is lost.

The campaign is the property and casualty insurer’s most aggressive yet, said Tom Faulconer, senior vice president and chief marketing officer for the insurer, part of the national Farm Bureau network. The company employs 1,200 people in Indiana and wrote $486 million in premiums in 2009.

“We’re up against a crowded field with Geico and Progressive, and they’re spending millions and millions of dollars that we don’t have to spend,” he said. “We’re trying to differentiate ourselves.”

Thirty-second spots airing nationally on Fox during the game sold for about $3 million each. Indiana Farm Bureau’s ads will cost the company six figures, Young & Laramore's Denari said.

The spots unveiled during the Super Bowl will run throughout the year. Additional ads will be developed in the fall for next year, Denari said.

“We have always done more of a name-recognition, feel-good type of campaign,” Faulconer said. “This one’s a little more direct. It’s more than just branding.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT