IBJNews

Indiana Landmarks still trying to save pre-Civil War home

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Landmarks is making another push to save an 1850 house on the city’s northwest side that is threatened by development.

The Cotton-Ropkey House, at 79th Street and Marsh Road just west of Interstate 465, sits on 95 acres that Kite Realty Group bought in 2004. Five years later, facing a tepid development climate, Kite agreed to let Landmarks search for a buyer. Kite would sell the house for $1 if the buyer would agree to move it to another site.

So far, Landmarks has come up empty in its search, but the preservation group has renewed the effort, publicizing the plight of the house in its recent newsletter. “The house enjoyed a brief reprieve when development plans for the property stalled,” the newsletter said. “But now the redevelopment of the site is gearing up and the Italianate-style house is in grave danger.”

REW_Cotton_Ropkey_HouseThe home sits on a 95-acre site on 79th Street that developer Kite Realty Group bought in 2004. (Photo courtesy Indiana Landmarks)

Chad Lethig, Indianapolis preservation coordinator for Indiana Landmarks, says the house, which is one of the oldest structures in Marion County, could be moved for about $35,000. The problem is there aren’t many places to move it.

To the east is I-465, which the house couldn’t cross, and within a mile of the site to the west and south there are topography issues that would make moving it all but impossible, Lethig said. He said the house could be moved north, over land, to 86th Street if the move happened when the ground is frozen—or very dry, as it is now.

The most likely site is a three-quarter-acre parcel facing 79th Street that is roughly 1,000 feet to the west in the Normandy Farms subdivision. Lethig said the land could be purchased for between $65,000 and $85,000.

Depending on the buyer’s plans, the house could be moved and restored for between $185,000 and $285,000, including the land, according to Indiana Landmarks estimates.

Although the house has been added to over the years, the original house—and the part Landmarks is most keen to save—is a 2,200-square-foot, two-story structure with Greek Revival and Italianate features, including six-over-six windows, walnut floors, crown moldings, and other original details.

Sandy Weddle, a broker for F.C. Tucker Co. who is familiar with the northwest side, said the house would list for at least $300,000 after a well-executed restoration.

Lethig believes time is running out. “Our fear is the [development] market is starting to turn around. [Kite is] starting to grow a little anxious about keeping it.”

Zeff Weiss, an attorney at Ice Miller who represents the owner, said the house is threatened by theft and vandalism. But he said development is not imminent and his client hasn’t given Landmarks a deadline.

Lethig said it isn’t out of the question that Landmarks would buy and move the house, but he said the preservation group’s real estate program is “cash poor at the moment.”   

The pre-Civil War home was built by farmer John Cotton beginning in 1848 and stayed in the family until 1937, when the Ropkey family bought it. The Ropkeys sold the house in 2004.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • House is in Historic Traders Point area
    this is a significant house on the eastern edge of one of the earliest settlement areas in the county; historic Traders Point. For more info on the area visit my site www.historictraderspoint.org

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT