Irsay quickly gains Twitter following

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Since joining Twitter last week, Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay has talked about player injuries, compared his team's season to an epic boxing match, launched a scavenger hunt and made reference to a former drug habit.

Irsay, 51, already has more than 7,000 followers who now enjoy constant exposure to one of the NFL's wackiest personalities.

Monday morning, in the wake of the Colts' overtime loss to the Dallas Cowboys, Irsay (@JimIrsay) mused about John Lennon and worked in a reference—as he often does—to "The Big Lebowski."

"30 years without John Lennon keeps me thinkin bout what could of been?" Irsay tweeted. "John would of loved twitter! John would of luved Eminem, Gaga, D.Chop."

Irsay proceeded to tweet lyrics from the Beatles' "I Am the Walrus," followed by a tweet referring to a scene from "The Big Lebowski," the cult-classic Cohen brothers film about an aging hippie who calls himself "the Dude."

Irsay's affinity for rock-n-roll, 1960s counter-culture and zany adventure is well-documented. In 2007, he dressed as Willy Wonka for an announcement on Monument Circle about a scavenger hunt for Super Bowl rings.

That was without the help of Twitter, noted publicist Myra Borshoff Cook, who helped orchestrate that event. "He has always looked for ways to connect with fans in a personal way," she said.

Borshoff Cook wasn't consulted on Irsay's jumping into Twitter, but she guessed that his three daughters, who are in their 20s, had an influence. "I think it's refreshing," she said.

Team spokesman Craig Kelley said that, in general,  "the response has been overwhelmingly positive."

The Colts did not respond directly to IBJ's inquiries about some of Irsay's tweets, including this one from Sunday night: "I don't drink or drug anymore. I became allergic to them. I brake (sic) out in handcuffs when I take them!!!!!"

The reference to past drug use may remind followers about Irsay's own struggles. In 2002, his prescription-drug abuse came to light through a Drug Enforcement Administration probe of a local pharmacy.

Borshoff Cook said she has no opinion on what Irsay should or shouldn't tweet.

"He commands a lot of respect amongst the [NFL team] owners. At the same time, he speaks in rock-n-roll lyrics. He plays the guitar. There's a part of him that is playful and kinda whimsical. Some of that is coming out in this tweeting thing."



  • It Does
    Walrus, read the article... it does have his Twitter name. The time you spent writing, you could have spent reading to find it. It's in there, try again.
  • RE: Twitter Handle
    I'm not a huge Twitter fan, but my first guess would be @JimIrsay. Oh, lookie there....that's what it is. Use your brain, Walrus.
  • Twitter Handle
    You'd think the article would include his Twitter handle?

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.