Judge delays ruling on dismissal of White case

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An Indiana judge expects to rule by Dec. 16 on whether Indiana Secretary of State Charlie White must stand trial on voter fraud and other criminal charges that could lead to his ouster.

Attorney Carl Brizzi urged Hamilton Superior Court Judge Steven Nation on Friday to dismiss the seven felony counts against White. The charges stem from accusations the Republican lied about his residence in the 2010 primary so he could continue collecting his salary from the Fishers Town Council.

Brizzi argued the grand jury that indicted White in March did not allow evidence favorable to White to be introduced.

White also faces a civil lawsuit filed by Democrats seeking to have him declared ineligible for office. A Marion County judge is expected to rule in that case this month.


  • Today's Justice Today
    I hear a number of comments that say, "Because Richard Lugar and Evan Bayh are not charged, the indictment against Charlie White should be dismissed."

    That makes no sense. Because other motorists don't get a speeding ticket, somebody who is speeding should NOT get a ticket?

    If there is a case to be made against Lugar and Bayh, then it is up to the prosecutor for that county to evaluate the facts of the case and decide accordingly.

    According to the reports in the Indy Star, 6 of the 8 juror who testified at Charlie White's grand jury were favorable to his position AND THE JURY STILL INDICTED, there must be some pretty good evidence of his guilt.

    Maybe it is high time for politician's to be held accountable for their actions like EVERYONE ELSE.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!