IBJNews

Lafayette Square amusement center closes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The closing of America’s Incredible Pizza Co. in Lafayette Square Mall on Indianapolis’ west side leaves another big hole to fill at a shopping center that has lost several key tenants in recent years.

The indoor amusement center that had occupied 75,000 square feet shut down Sunday, according to the mall’s information center.

Calls to the corporate headquarters in Springfield, Mo., were not returned.

The pizza firm opened at the mall in July 2010 in a space occupied the previous two years by the Xscape amusement center. Legal challenges from the family of a 5-year-old boy who fell off a teacup ride operated by Indianapolis-based Zoom Entertainment LLC, the amusement park’s owner, prompted Xscape’s closure.

The America’s Incredible Pizza chain has 10 locations, including one near Greenwood Park Mall. The Greenwood site, which is operated by a different franchisee than the one at Lafayette Square, remains open.

Lafayette Square was about 85-percent occupied before the closing, according to IBJ statistics.

New York-based Ashkenazy Acquisition Corp. bought the 1.2 million-square-foot shopping center from Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group Inc. in December 2007.

Since then, anchors Macy’s, Sears and Steve & Barry’s have left the 44-year-old mall.

America’s Incredible Pizza Co. was the third-largest tenant in the mall behind a 141,000-square-foot Burlington Coat Factory and a 95,000-square-foot Shoppers World department store that opened in December 2008 on the first floor of a former JC Penney space.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • sad
    I took my nieces here, and the staff was friendly, and the place always seemed to be busy enough when we would go- but half the appeal was being alone in the toddler zone, so maybe not all that surprising. I have an under/over of 5 years for Lafayette Square, which is sad, because it's always been 'my' mall, and I'd love for someone to come in and show Indy what they've been missing on the Westside.
  • Lots to offer
    Despite the negative stereotypes, the Lafayette Square area has lots to offer. There are fantastic ethnic restaurants throughout the area, and many small businesses that add to the fabric of our city such as Georgetown Market. It doesn't "scare" me to go there to eat or shop.

    Also, I think the store was Steve & Barry's, not Dave & Barry's.
  • what?
    Lucky Pierre, Im a 35 year old ex-marine, AND I'm whats known as a "killer kilo". At this very second, I wont even drive in that area, the only reason I will is to go to Nick's chili 2-3 times a year.

    Remember in all the movies where bad things happen, theres always a crowd of people with unwise advice that are vaporized or something..... cue pierre.
  • haha?
    Can we move on from the whole Lafayette "Scare" thing? It's so old and it really shows your intelligence, Amber. If you don't like the mall, don't shop there. And if you don't shop there, then this article really doesn't concern you. Go back to the couch.
  • haha
    its Lafayette Scare not lafayette sqaure.. get it right

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT