IBJNews

Lawsuit over girls basketball games to proceed

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A federal appeals court says a judge should not have dismissed a lawsuit over the scheduling of high school boys and girls basketball games in Indiana.<br />
    <br />
    The ruling Tuesday by the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago means the lawsuit against Franklin County High School and 13 others filed by Amber Parker and Tammy Hurley for their daughters can proceed.<br />
    <br />
    The lawsuit claims the schedules discriminate against girls because their games are generally scheduled on school nights while most boys games are scheduled on weekends. It says the scheduling violates the federal anti-discrimination law Title IX.<br />
    <br />
    The court said it believes the appellants presented a genuine question of fact that merits further review. Parker is a former varsity girls&rsquo; basketball coach at Franklin County High School.&nbsp;</p>
<p>
    During the 2009-2010 season, nearly 95 percent of the Franklin boys&rsquo; varsity games were played during &ldquo;primetime&rdquo; &ndash; nights that do not precede school days, her complaint said. In that same season, only 53 percent of girls&rsquo; games occurred during primetime.<br />
    <br />
    Parker&rsquo;s complaint stated that because girls&rsquo; teams are relegated to weeknight play, the players have trouble keeping up with homework obligations, are less likely to have fan support, and generally feel that their accomplishments are less important than the boys&rsquo; teams.
 


ADVERTISEMENT
  • Really?!?!
    Let's hope your children are all non-athletic boys...It does make a difference. Every person on a team has the right to compete on a fair and even field. If that means have all the games on Friday night, so be it. It's what we did when I was in high school. It started with the JV's at 4:30 and went on from there.
  • People dont CARE
    It's girls basketball. Most dont care about it.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Any "Domestic Partner Registry" is subject to significant fraud just like the recent media investigation showing huge problems with the Indiana Sex and Violent Offender Registry.

      What prevents people from claiming benefits from more than one employer for more than one "partner"?

      Don't see the HR department conducting sex & committed relationship audits with home visits?

    2. Words cannot adequated express how riduculous this is. How can anyone go from 8.8 million to 29.2 million (thanks for the $4 gas prices by the way)??

    3. As the city is increasing employee costs, lowering insurance coverages, and completely dropping city/county benefit coverage for employed spouses/kids employed elsewhere, they want to start covering homosexual partners, girl/boy friends, and unemployed room mates?

    4. "At the heart of the change, said Speedway executives, is creating an event that is more friendly toward the track’s corporate partners." What about the fan? For the first time in my 15 years going to the track, I was confined to three small, cramped sections of turn 4 on Pole Day. Not enjoyable. Sponsors banners may generate revenue in the short term, but I don't see IMS/IndyCar doing anything to make the product they are selling more desirable. Sponsors only come where the fans are, so seems to me they have to do something to get more fans in the seats before selling advertising space on the walls. And 220 MPH ain't going to do it!

    5. TV ratings anyone? Name a driver that is not Penske or Ganassi? Ads on the turns? "It's a business..." that is the problem. It's racing and they are ruining it. Tony H. is spinning.

    ADVERTISEMENT