IBJNews

Lilly discontinues late-stage trial in rheumatoid arthritis

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. said it discontinued a trial of an experimental rheumatoid arthritis drug for lack of efficacy.

The trial, in the last stage of three generally required for regulatory approval, is one of three studies of tabalumab in rheumatoid arthritis, the Indianapolis-based company said Thursday in a prepared statement. The decision wasn’t based on safety concerns, Lilly said.

The company is still weighing the drug in the two other late-stage studies, and is holding off on enrolling new patients until more analyses are finished early next year. Those studies are being done in different populations of patients, Lilly said. The company is still evaluating tabalumab in systemic lupus erythematosus.

“The results of this study were unexpected given the data generated in earlier Phase II clinical studies of tabalumab,” Eiry Roberts, Lilly’s vice president of autoimmune product development, said in the statement. “We remain committed to patients with rheumatoid arthritis and lupus and will move rapidly to evaluate the impact of these data on the overall tabalumab clinical development program.”

Lilly said it expects to take a pretax charge of $20 million to $35 million in the fourth quarter, or about 2 cents a share after tax. The company’s 2012 forecast is unchanged, it said.

Two other companies reported discouraging trial results for a rheumatoid arthritis drug on Thursday. AstraZeneca PLC and Rigel Therapeutics Inc. said their drug fostamatinib did not work as well as Abbott Laboratories Inc.'s Humira in a mid-stage clinical trial. AstraZeneca is running a larger trial of fostamatinib and expects to get results in early 2013.

Rigel's stock plunged 34.6 percent, to $5.51 per share, Thursday on the news.

Humira is the leading rheumatoid arthritis drug by sales, bringing in about $9 billion in annual revenue.

Rheumatoid arthritis is a major area of research for drug companies because it is a chronic condition, meaning patients will likely take the drugs regularly for a long time. In November, the Food and Drug Administration approved a new treatment for the disease, Pfizer Inc.'s twice-a-day pill Xeljanz.

Shares of Lilly lost 77 cents, to $48.23 each, on Thursday. AstraZeneca shares fell 2.9 percent, to $47.46, and shares of Abbott Laboratories lost 69 cents, to $65.32.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why not take some time to do some research before traveling to that Indiana town or city, and find the ones that are no smoking either inside, or have a patio? People like yourself are just being selfish, and unnecessarily trying to take away all indoor venues that smokers can enjoy themselves at. Last time I checked, it is still a free country, and businesses do respond to market pressure and will ban smoking, if there's enough demand by customers for it(i.e. Linebacker Lounge in South Bend, and Rack and Helen's in New Haven, IN, outside of Fort Wayne). Indiana law already unnecessarily forced restaurants with a bar area to be no smoking, so why not support those restaurants that were forced to ban smoking against their will? Also, I'm always surprised at the number of bars that chose to ban smoking on their own, in non-ban parts of Indiana I'll sometimes travel into. Whiting, IN(just southeast of Chicago) has at least a few bars that went no smoking on their own accord, and despite no selfish government ban forcing those bars to make that move against their will! I'd much rather have a balance of both smoking and non-smoking bars, rather than a complete bar smoking ban that'll only force more bars to close their doors. And besides IMO, there are much worser things to worry about, than cigarette smoke inside a bar. If you feel a bar is too smoky, then simply walk out and take your business to a different bar!

  2. As other states are realizing the harm in jailing offenders of marijuana...Indiana steps backwards into the script of Reefer Madness. Well...you guys voted for your Gov...up to you to vote him out. Signed, Citizen of Florida...the next state to have medical marijuana.

  3. It's empowering for this niche community to know that they have an advocate on their side in case things go awry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrst9VXVKfE

  4. Apparently the settlement over Angie's List "bundling" charges hasn't stopped the practice! My membership is up for renewal, and I'm on my third email trying to get a "basic" membership rather than the "bundled" version they're trying to charge me for. Frustrating!!

  5. Well....as a vendor to both of these builders I guess I have the right to comment. Davis closed his doors with integrity.He paid me every penny he owed me. Estridge,STILL owes me thousands and thousands of dollars. The last few years of my life have been spent working 2 jobs, paying off the suppliers I used to work on Estridge jobs and just struggling to survive. Shame on you Paul...and shame on you IBJ! Maybe you should have contacted the hundreds of vendors that Paul stiffed. I'm sure your "rises from the ashes" spin on reporting would have contained true stories of real people who have struggled to find work and pay of their debts (something that Paul didn't even attempt to do).

ADVERTISEMENT